bwlp/qemu.git/block/quorum.c, branch spice_video_codecs

quorum: Remove unnecessary forward declaration

2022-10-07T10:11:41+00:00

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf Message-Id: <20221006122607.162769-1-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf

quorum: add missing coroutine_fn annotations

2022-10-07T10:11:41+00:00

Callers of coroutine_fn must be coroutine_fn themselves, or the call must be within "if (qemu_in_coroutine())". Apply coroutine_fn to functions where this holds. Reviewed-by: Alberto Faria Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Message-Id: <20220922084924.201610-19-pbonzini@redhat.com> [kwolf: Fixed up coding style] Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf

osdep: Move memalign-related functions to their own header

2022-03-07T13:16:49+00:00

Move the various memalign-related functions out of osdep.h and into their own header, which we include only where they are used. While we're doing this, add some brief documentation comments. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Message-id: 20220226180723.1706285-10-peter.maydell@linaro.org

block: use int64_t instead of int in driver write_zeroes handlers

2021-09-29T18:46:32+00:00

We are generally moving to int64_t for both offset and bytes parameters on all io paths. Main motivation is realization of 64-bit write_zeroes operation for fast zeroing large disk chunks, up to the whole disk. We chose signed type, to be consistent with off_t (which is signed) and with possibility for signed return type (where negative value means error). So, convert driver write_zeroes handlers bytes parameter to int64_t. The only caller of all updated function is bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes(). bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes() itself is of course OK with widening of callee parameter type. Also, bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes()'s max_write_zeroes is limited to INT_MAX. So, updated functions all are safe, they will not get "bytes" larger than before. Still, let's look through all updated functions, and add assertions to the ones which are actually unprepared to values larger than INT_MAX. For these drivers also set explicit max_pwrite_zeroes limit. Let's go: blkdebug: calculations can't overflow, thanks to bdrv_check_qiov_request() in generic layer. rule_check() and bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() both have 64bit argument. blklogwrites: pass to blk_log_writes_co_log() with 64bit argument. blkreplay, copy-on-read, filter-compress: pass to bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() which is OK copy-before-write: Calls cbw_do_copy_before_write() and bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes, both have 64bit argument. file-posix: both handler calls raw_do_pwrite_zeroes, which is updated. In raw_do_pwrite_zeroes() calculations are OK due to bdrv_check_qiov_request(), bytes go to RawPosixAIOData::aio_nbytes which is uint64_t. Check also where that uint64_t gets handed: handle_aiocb_write_zeroes_block() passes a uint64_t[2] to ioctl(BLKZEROOUT), handle_aiocb_write_zeroes() calls do_fallocate() which takes off_t (and we compile to always have 64-bit off_t), as does handle_aiocb_write_zeroes_unmap. All look safe. gluster: bytes go to GlusterAIOCB::size which is int64_t and to glfs_zerofill_async works with off_t. iscsi: Aha, here we deal with iscsi_writesame16_task() that has uint32_t num_blocks argument and iscsi_writesame16_task() has uint16_t argument. Make comments, add assertions and clarify max_pwrite_zeroes calculation. iscsi_allocmap_() functions already has int64_t argument is_byte_request_lun_aligned is simple to update, do it. mirror_top: pass to bdrv_mirror_top_do_write which has uint64_t argument nbd: Aha, here we have protocol limitation, and NBDRequest::len is uint32_t. max_pwrite_zeroes is cleanly set to 32bit value, so we are OK for now. nvme: Again, protocol limitation. And no inherent limit for write-zeroes at all. But from code that calculates cdw12 it's obvious that we do have limit and alignment. Let's clarify it. Also, obviously the code is not prepared to handle bytes=0. Let's handle this case too. trace events already 64bit preallocate: pass to handle_write() and bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes(), both 64bit. rbd: pass to qemu_rbd_start_co() which is 64bit. qcow2: offset + bytes and alignment still works good (thanks to bdrv_check_qiov_request()), so tail calculation is OK qcow2_subcluster_zeroize() has 64bit argument, should be OK trace events updated qed: qed_co_request wants int nb_sectors. Also in code we have size_t used for request length which may be 32bit. So, let's just keep INT_MAX as a limit (aligning it down to pwrite_zeroes_alignment) and don't care. raw-format: Is OK. raw_adjust_offset and bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes are both 64bit. throttle: Both throttle_group_co_io_limits_intercept() and bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() are 64bit. vmdk: pass to vmdk_pwritev which is 64bit quorum: pass to quorum_co_pwritev() which is 64bit Hooray! At this point all block drivers are prepared to support 64bit write-zero requests, or have explicitly set max_pwrite_zeroes. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Message-Id: <20210903102807.27127-8-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake [eblake: use <= rather than < in assertions relying on max_pwrite_zeroes] Signed-off-by: Eric Blake

block: use int64_t instead of uint64_t in driver write handlers

2021-09-29T18:46:31+00:00

block: use int64_t instead of uint64_t in driver read handlers

2021-09-29T18:46:31+00:00

block/quorum: Provide .bdrv_co_flush instead of .bdrv_co_flush_to_disk

2021-06-02T12:23:20+00:00

The quorum block driver uses a custom flush callback to handle the case when some children return io errors. In that case it still returns success if enough children are healthy. However, it provides it as the .bdrv_co_flush_to_disk callback, not as .bdrv_co_flush. This causes the block layer to do it's own generic flushing for the children instead, which doesn't handle errors properly. Fix this by providing .bdrv_co_flush instead of .bdrv_co_flush_to_disk so the block layer uses the custom flush callback. Signed-off-by: Lukas Straub Reported-by: Minghao Yuan Message-Id: <20210518134214.11ccf05f@gecko.fritz.box> Tested-by: Zhang Chen Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf

block: check return value of bdrv_open_child and drop error propagation

2021-03-08T21:07:09+00:00

This patch is generated by cocci script: @@ symbol bdrv_open_child, errp, local_err; expression file; @@ file = bdrv_open_child(..., - &local_err + errp ); - if (local_err) + if (!file) { ... - error_propagate(errp, local_err); ... } with command spatch --sp-file x.cocci --macro-file scripts/cocci-macro-file.h \ --in-place --no-show-diff --max-width 80 --use-gitgrep block Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia Message-Id: <20210202124956.63146-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> [eblake: fix qcow2_do_open() to use ERRP_GUARD, necessary as the only caller to pass allow_none=true] Signed-off-by: Eric Blake

quorum: Implement bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes()

2020-12-18T11:35:55+00:00

This simply calls bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() in all children. bs->supported_zero_flags is also set to the flags that are supported by all children. Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia Message-Id: <2f09c842781fe336b4c2e40036bba577b7430190.1605286097.git.berto@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz Signed-off-by: Max Reitz

quorum: Implement bdrv_co_block_status()

2020-12-18T11:35:55+00:00

The quorum driver does not implement bdrv_co_block_status() and because of that it always reports to contain data even if all its children are known to be empty. One consequence of this is that if we for example create a quorum with a size of 10GB and we mirror it to a new image the operation will write 10GB of actual zeroes to the destination image wasting a lot of time and disk space. Since a quorum has an arbitrary number of children of potentially different formats there is no way to report all possible allocation status flags in a way that makes sense, so this implementation only reports when a given region is known to contain zeroes (BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO) or not (BDRV_BLOCK_DATA). If all children agree that a region contains zeroes then we can return BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO using the smallest size reported by the children (because all agree that a region of at least that size contains zeroes). If at least one child disagrees we have to return BDRV_BLOCK_DATA. In this case we use the largest of the sizes reported by the children that didn't return BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO (because we know that there won't be an agreement for at least that size). Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia Tested-by: Tao Xu Reviewed-by: Max Reitz Message-Id: Signed-off-by: Max Reitz