| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We will need a target-specific hook for adjusting registers
in the parent during clone. Add an empty inline function for
each target, and invoke it from the proper places.
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191106113318.10226-11-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We will need a target-specific hook for adjusting registers
in the parent during clone. To avoid confusion, rename the
one we have to make it clear it affects the child.
At the same time, pass in the flags from the clone syscall.
We will need them for correct behaviour for Sparc.
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191106113318.10226-10-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The license information in these files is rather confusing. The text
declares LGPL first, but then says that contributions after 2012 are
licensed under the GPL instead. How should the average user who just
downloaded the release tarball know which part is now GPL and which
is LGPL?
Looking at the text of the LGPL (see COPYING.LIB in the top directory),
the license clearly states how this should be done instead:
"3. You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public
License instead of this License to a given copy of the Library. To do
this, you must alter all the notices that refer to this License, so
that they refer to the ordinary GNU General Public License, version 2,
instead of to this License."
Thus let's clean up the confusing statements and use the proper GPL
text only.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1549456893-16589-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless includes
Fix HPPA include guard.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Acked-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20180529194207.31503-9-laurent@vivier.eu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These headers all use TARGET_CPU_H as header guard symbol. Reuse of
the same guard symbol in multiple headers is okay as long as they
cannot be included together.
Since we can avoid guard symbol reuse easily, do so: use guard symbol
$target_TARGET_CPU_H for linux-user/$target/target_cpu.h.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
|
|
|
The functions cpu_clone_regs() and cpu_set_tls() are not purely CPU
related -- they are specific to the TLS ABI for a a particular OS.
Move them into the linux-user/ tree where they belong.
target-lm32 had entirely unused implementations, since it has no
linux-user target; just drop them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
|
