summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/scripts/qapi/parser.py
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* qapi: Fix parse errors for removal of null from schema languageMarkus Armbruster2021-03-051-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | Commit 9d55380b5a "qapi: Remove null from schema language" (v4.2.0) neglected to update two error messages. Do that now. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20210224101442.1837475-1-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
* qapi: enforce import order/styling with isortJohn Snow2020-10-101-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | While we're mucking around with imports, we might as well formalize the style we use. Let's use isort to do it for us. lines_after_imports=2: Use two lines after imports, to match PEP8's desire to have "two lines before and after" class definitions, which are likely to start immediately after imports. force_sort_within_sections: Intermingles "from x" and "import x" style statements, such that sorting is always performed strictly on the module name itself. force_grid_wrap=4: Four or more imports from a single module will force the one-per-line style that's more git-friendly. This will generally happen for 'typing' imports. multi_line_output=3: Uses the one-per-line indented style for long imports. include_trailing_comma: Adds a comma to the last import in a group, which makes git conflicts nicer to deal with, generally. line_length: 72 is chosen to match PEP8's "docstrings and comments" line length limit. If you have a single line import that exceeds 72 characters, your names are too long! Suggested-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com> Tested-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20201009161558.107041-8-jsnow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
* qapi: Prefer explicit relative importsJohn Snow2020-10-101-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | All of the QAPI include statements are changed to be package-aware, as explicit relative imports. A quirk of Python packages is that the name of the package exists only *outside* of the package. This means that to a module inside of the qapi folder, there is inherently no such thing as the "qapi" package. The reason these imports work is because the "qapi" package exists in the context of the caller -- the execution shim, where sys.path includes a directory that has a 'qapi' folder in it. When we write "from qapi import sibling", we are NOT referencing the folder 'qapi', but rather "any package named qapi in sys.path". If you should so happen to have a 'qapi' package in your path, it will use *that* package. When we write "from .sibling import foo", we always reference explicitly our sibling module; guaranteeing consistency in *where* we are importing these modules from. This can be useful when working with virtual environments and packages in development mode. In development mode, a package is installed as a series of symlinks that forwards to your same source files. The problem arises because code quality checkers will follow "import qapi.x" to the "installed" version instead of the sibling file and -- even though they are the same file -- they have different module paths, and this causes cyclic import problems, false positive type mismatch errors, and more. It can also be useful when dealing with hierarchical packages, e.g. if we allow qemu.core.qmp, qemu.qapi.parser, etc. Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20201009161558.107041-6-jsnow@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
* scripts/qapi/parser.py: improve doc comment indent handlingPeter Maydell2020-09-291-19/+74
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Make the handling of indentation in doc comments more sophisticated, so that when we see a section like: Notes: some text some more text indented line 3 we save it for the doc-comment processing code as: some text some more text indented line 3 and when we see a section with the heading on its own line: Notes: some text some more text indented text we also accept that and save it in the same form. If we detect that the comment document text is not indented as much as we expect it to be, we throw a parse error. (We don't complain about over-indented sections, because for rST this can be legitimate markup.) The golden reference for the doc comment text is updated to remove the two 'wrong' indents; these now form a test case that we correctly stripped leading whitespace from an indented multi-line argument definition. We update the documentation in docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt to describe the new indentation rules. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20200925162316.21205-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> [Whitespace between sentences tweaked] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
* scripts/qapi: Move doc-comment whitespace stripping to doc.pyPeter Maydell2020-09-291-8/+4Star
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | As we accumulate lines from doc comments when parsing the JSON, the QAPIDoc class generally strips leading and trailing whitespace using line.strip() when it calls _append_freeform(). This is fine for Texinfo, but for rST leading whitespace is significant. We'd like to move to having the text in doc comments be rST format rather than a custom syntax, so move the removal of leading whitespace from the QAPIDoc class to the texinfo-specific processing code in texi_format() in qapi/doc.py. (Trailing whitespace will always be stripped by the rstrip() in Section::append regardless.) In a followup commit we will make the whitespace in the lines of doc comment sections more consistently follow the input source. There is no change to the generated .texi files before and after this commit. Because the qapi-schema test checks the exact values of the documentation comments against a reference, we need to update that reference to match the new whitespace. In the first four places this is now correctly checking that we did put in the amount of whitespace to pass a rST-formatted list to the backend; in the last two places the extra whitespace is 'wrong' and will go away again in the following commit. Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20200925162316.21205-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
* qapi: Make section headings start a new doc comment blockMarkus Armbruster2020-09-071-8/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Our current QAPI doc-comment markup allows section headers (introduced with a leading '=' or '==') anywhere in a free-form documentation comment. This works for Texinfo because the generator simply prints a Texinfo section command at that point in the output stream. For rST generation, since we're assembling a tree of docutils nodes, this is awkward because a new section implies starting a new section node at the top level of the tree and generating text into there. Make section headers start a new free-form documentation block, so the future rST document generator doesn't have to look at every line in free-form blocks and handle headings in odd places. This change makes no difference to the generated Texinfo. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200320091805.5585-3-armbru@redhat.com>
* qapi: Reject section markup in definition documentationMarkus Armbruster2020-09-071-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | Section markup in definition documentation makes no sense and can produce invalid Texinfo. Reject. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200320091805.5585-2-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
* qapi: Brush off some (py)lintMarkus Armbruster2020-03-051-4/+2Star
| | | | | | Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200304155932.20452-5-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
* qapi: Use super() now we have Python 3Markus Armbruster2020-03-051-1/+1
| | | | | | Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200304155932.20452-4-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
* qapi: Drop conditionals for Python 2Markus Armbruster2020-03-051-5/+1Star
| | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200304155932.20452-3-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
* qapi: Inheriting from object is pointless with Python 3, dropMarkus Armbruster2020-03-051-3/+3
| | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200304155932.20452-2-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
* qapi: Check feature documentation against the schemaMarkus Armbruster2019-10-291-9/+22
| | | | | | | | | Commit f3ed93d545 "qapi: Allow documentation for features" neglected to check documentation against the schema. Fix that: check them the same way we check arguments. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-20-armbru@redhat.com>
* qapi: Polish reporting of bogus member documentationMarkus Armbruster2019-10-291-2/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Improve error messages from the following documented members are not in the declaration: a the following documented members are not in the declaration: aa, bb to the more concise documented member 'a' does not exist documented members 'aa', 'bb' do not exist Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-19-armbru@redhat.com>
* qapi: Split up scripts/qapi/common.pyMarkus Armbruster2019-10-221-0/+570
The QAPI code generator clocks in at some 3100 SLOC in 8 source files. Almost 60% of the code is in qapi/common.py. Split it into more focused modules: * Move QAPISchemaPragma and QAPISourceInfo to qapi/source.py. * Move QAPIError and its sub-classes to qapi/error.py. * Move QAPISchemaParser and QAPIDoc to parser.py. Use the opportunity to put QAPISchemaParser first. * Move check_expr() & friends to qapi/expr.py. Use the opportunity to put the code into a more sensible order. * Move QAPISchema & friends to qapi/schema.py * Move QAPIGen and its sub-classes, ifcontext, QAPISchemaModularCVisitor, and QAPISchemaModularCVisitor to qapi/gen.py * Delete camel_case(), it's unused since commit e98859a9b9 "qapi: Clean up after recent conversions to QAPISchemaVisitor" A number of helper functions remain in qapi/common.py. I considered moving the code generator helpers to qapi/gen.py, but decided not to. Perhaps we should rewrite them as methods of QAPIGen some day. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20191018074345.24034-7-armbru@redhat.com> [Add "# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-" lines]