Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | powernv: Don't test POWER9 CPU yet | David Gibson | 2017-03-03 | 1 | -1/+4 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A couple of tests for the work-in-progress 'powernv' machine type attempt to test on POWER9 CPUs. However the POWER9 CPU support is incomplete and this doesn't really work. In particular the firmware image we have currently assumes the presence of the SDR1 register, which no longer exists on POWER9. We only got away with this so far, because of a different bug which added SDR1 to POWER9 even though it shouldn't be there. For now, remove POWER9 testing of powernv, POWER8 testing will do for now until the POWER9 support is more complete. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> | ||||
* | tests: add XSCOM tests for the PowerNV machine | David Gibson | 2016-11-15 | 1 | -0/+140 |
Add a couple of tests on the XSCOM bus of the PowerNV machine for the the POWER8 and POWER9 CPUs. The first tests reads the CFAM identifier of the chip. The second test goes further in the XSCOM address space and reaches the cores to read their DTS registers. Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> [dwg: Fixed an incorrect indentation, and a Makefile problem]] Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> |