summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.json
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* tests/qapi-schema: Convert doc-good.json to rST-style strong/emphasisPeter Maydell2020-09-291-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | doc-good.json currently uses the old *strong* and _emphasis_ markup. As part of the conversion to rST this needs to switch to **strong** and *emphasis*, because rST uses underscores as part of its markup of hyperlinks and will otherwise warn about the syntax error. In commit a660eed482063b we fixed up the in-tree uses of the old markup: 1) _this_ was replaced with *this* 2) the only in-tree use of *this* was left alone (turning a 'strong' into an 'emphasis') (and so currently in-tree nothing is using either new-style **strong** or old-style _emphasis_). Update doc-good.json in a similar way: 1) replace _this_ with *this* 2) remove the usage of old-style *this* (This slightly reduces the coverage for the old Texinfo generator, which is about to go away, but is fine for the new rST generator because that does not need to handle strong/emphasis itself because it is simply passing the entire text as raw rST to Sphinx.) Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20200925162316.21205-13-peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
* tests/qapi/doc-good.json: Prepare for qapi-doc Sphinx extensionPeter Maydell2020-09-291-12/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | doc-good.json tests doc comment parser corner cases. We're about to largely replace it by a Sphinx extension, which will have different corner cases. Tweak the test so it passes both with the old parser and the Sphinx extension, by making it match the more restrictive rST syntax: * in a single list the bullet types must all match * lists must have leading and following blank lines * the rules on when and where indentation matters differ * the '|' example syntax is going to go away entirely, so stop testing it This will avoid the tests spuriously breaking when we tighten up the parser code in the following commits. Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20200925162316.21205-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
* schemas: Add vim modelineAndrea Bolognani2020-08-031-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The various schemas included in QEMU use a JSON-based format which is, however, strictly speaking not valid JSON. As a consequence, when vim tries to apply syntax highlight rules for JSON (as guessed from the file name), the result is an unreadable mess which mostly consist of red markers pointing out supposed errors in, well, pretty much everything. Using Python syntax highlighting produces much better results, and in fact these files already start with specially-formatted comments that instruct Emacs to process them as if they were Python files. This commit adds the equivalent special comments for vim. Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200729185024.121766-1-abologna@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
* qapi: Add feature flags to struct membersMarkus Armbruster2020-03-171-1/+4
| | | | | | Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200317115459.31821-21-armbru@redhat.com>
* qapi: Add feature flags to remaining definitionsMarkus Armbruster2020-03-171-0/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In v4.1.0, we added feature flags just to struct types (commit 6a8c0b5102^..f3ed93d545), to satisfy an immediate need (commit c9d4070991 "file-posix: Add dynamic-auto-read-only QAPI feature"). In v4.2.0, we added them to commands (commit 23394b4c39 "qapi: Add feature flags to commands") to satisfy another immediate need (commit d76744e65e "qapi: Allow introspecting fix for savevm's cooperation with blockdev"). Add them to the remaining definitions: enumeration types, union types, alternate types, and events. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200317115459.31821-13-armbru@redhat.com>
* qapi: Implement boxed event argument documentationMarkus Armbruster2019-10-291-1/+0Star
| | | | | | | | | | | | Generate a reference "Arguments: the members of ...", just like we do for commands since commit c2dd311cb7 "qapi2texi: Implement boxed argument documentation". No change to generated QMP documentation; we don't yet use boxed events outside tests/. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-7-armbru@redhat.com>
* tests/qapi-schema: Cover alternate documentation commentsMarkus Armbruster2019-10-291-0/+8
| | | | | Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-4-armbru@redhat.com>
* tests/qapi-schema: Demonstrate command and event doc comment bugsMarkus Armbruster2019-10-291-0/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add negative tests doc-bad-boxed-command-arg and doc-bad-event-arg to cover boxed and no arguments. They demonstrate insufficient doc comment checking. Update positive test doc-good to cover boxed event arguments. It demonstrates the generated doc comment misses arguments. These bugs will be fixed later in this series. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-3-armbru@redhat.com>
* tests/qapi-schema: Cover feature documentation commentsMarkus Armbruster2019-10-221-2/+15
| | | | | | | | | | Commit 8aa3a33e44 "tests/qapi-schema: Test for good feature lists in structs" neglected to cover documentation comments, and the previous commit followed its example. Make up for them. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20191018081454.21369-5-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
* qapi: add condition to variants documentationMarc-André Lureau2018-12-141-2/+2
| | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181213123724.4866-21-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
* qapi: add 'If:' condition to struct members documentationMarc-André Lureau2018-12-141-1/+2
| | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181213123724.4866-20-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
* qapi: add 'If:' condition to enum values documentationMarc-André Lureau2018-12-141-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Use a common function to generate the "If:..." line. While at it, get rid of the existing \n\n (no idea why it was there). Use a line-break in member description, this seems to look slightly better in the plaintext version. Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181213123724.4866-19-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
* qapi: add 'If:' section to generated documentationMarc-André Lureau2018-07-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | The documentation is generated only once, and doesn't know C pre-conditions. Add 'If:' sections for top-level entities. Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180703155648.11933-13-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
* tests/qapi-schema/doc-bad-section: New, factored out of doc-goodMarkus Armbruster2017-12-201-1/+0Star
| | | | | | | | | | A negative test case crept into doc-good.json: invalid use of section markup we currently fail to reject. Move this into its own doc-bad-section.json. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20171002141341.24616-6-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
* tests/qapi-schema: Systematic positive doc comment testsMarkus Armbruster2017-03-211-0/+136
We have a number of negative tests, but we don't have systematic positive coverage. Fix that. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1490015515-25851-6-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>