summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.json
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* qapi: Add feature flags to struct membersMarkus Armbruster2020-03-171-1/+4
| | | | | | Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200317115459.31821-21-armbru@redhat.com>
* qapi: Add feature flags to remaining definitionsMarkus Armbruster2020-03-171-0/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In v4.1.0, we added feature flags just to struct types (commit 6a8c0b5102^..f3ed93d545), to satisfy an immediate need (commit c9d4070991 "file-posix: Add dynamic-auto-read-only QAPI feature"). In v4.2.0, we added them to commands (commit 23394b4c39 "qapi: Add feature flags to commands") to satisfy another immediate need (commit d76744e65e "qapi: Allow introspecting fix for savevm's cooperation with blockdev"). Add them to the remaining definitions: enumeration types, union types, alternate types, and events. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200317115459.31821-13-armbru@redhat.com>
* qapi: Implement boxed event argument documentationMarkus Armbruster2019-10-291-1/+0Star
| | | | | | | | | | | | Generate a reference "Arguments: the members of ...", just like we do for commands since commit c2dd311cb7 "qapi2texi: Implement boxed argument documentation". No change to generated QMP documentation; we don't yet use boxed events outside tests/. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-7-armbru@redhat.com>
* tests/qapi-schema: Cover alternate documentation commentsMarkus Armbruster2019-10-291-0/+8
| | | | | Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-4-armbru@redhat.com>
* tests/qapi-schema: Demonstrate command and event doc comment bugsMarkus Armbruster2019-10-291-0/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add negative tests doc-bad-boxed-command-arg and doc-bad-event-arg to cover boxed and no arguments. They demonstrate insufficient doc comment checking. Update positive test doc-good to cover boxed event arguments. It demonstrates the generated doc comment misses arguments. These bugs will be fixed later in this series. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-3-armbru@redhat.com>
* tests/qapi-schema: Cover feature documentation commentsMarkus Armbruster2019-10-221-2/+15
| | | | | | | | | | Commit 8aa3a33e44 "tests/qapi-schema: Test for good feature lists in structs" neglected to cover documentation comments, and the previous commit followed its example. Make up for them. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20191018081454.21369-5-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
* qapi: add condition to variants documentationMarc-André Lureau2018-12-141-2/+2
| | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181213123724.4866-21-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
* qapi: add 'If:' condition to struct members documentationMarc-André Lureau2018-12-141-1/+2
| | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181213123724.4866-20-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
* qapi: add 'If:' condition to enum values documentationMarc-André Lureau2018-12-141-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Use a common function to generate the "If:..." line. While at it, get rid of the existing \n\n (no idea why it was there). Use a line-break in member description, this seems to look slightly better in the plaintext version. Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181213123724.4866-19-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
* qapi: add 'If:' section to generated documentationMarc-André Lureau2018-07-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | The documentation is generated only once, and doesn't know C pre-conditions. Add 'If:' sections for top-level entities. Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180703155648.11933-13-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
* tests/qapi-schema/doc-bad-section: New, factored out of doc-goodMarkus Armbruster2017-12-201-1/+0Star
| | | | | | | | | | A negative test case crept into doc-good.json: invalid use of section markup we currently fail to reject. Move this into its own doc-bad-section.json. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20171002141341.24616-6-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
* tests/qapi-schema: Systematic positive doc comment testsMarkus Armbruster2017-03-211-0/+136
We have a number of negative tests, but we don't have systematic positive coverage. Fix that. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1490015515-25851-6-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>