From fa53a0e53efdc7002497ea4a76aacf6cceb170ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gonglei Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 10:04:59 +0800 Subject: memory: drop find_ram_block() On the one hand, we have already qemu_get_ram_block() whose function is similar. On the other hand, we can directly use mr->ram_block but searching RAMblock by ram_addr which is a kind of waste. Signed-off-by: Gonglei Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng Message-Id: <1462845901-89716-2-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- include/exec/ram_addr.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/exec/ram_addr.h') diff --git a/include/exec/ram_addr.h b/include/exec/ram_addr.h index 5adf7a4fcd..5b6e1b8b86 100644 --- a/include/exec/ram_addr.h +++ b/include/exec/ram_addr.h @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ void qemu_set_ram_fd(ram_addr_t addr, int fd); void *qemu_get_ram_block_host_ptr(ram_addr_t addr); void qemu_ram_free(RAMBlock *block); -int qemu_ram_resize(ram_addr_t base, ram_addr_t newsize, Error **errp); +int qemu_ram_resize(RAMBlock *block, ram_addr_t newsize, Error **errp); #define DIRTY_CLIENTS_ALL ((1 << DIRTY_MEMORY_NUM) - 1) #define DIRTY_CLIENTS_NOCODE (DIRTY_CLIENTS_ALL & ~(1 << DIRTY_MEMORY_CODE)) -- cgit v1.2.3-55-g7522