diff options
author | Olaf Kirch | 2006-10-04 11:16:03 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds | 2006-10-04 16:55:18 +0200 |
commit | 39be4502cb75dc26007fe1659735b26c8e63fcc6 (patch) | |
tree | 0f4c6bf14f8a975178b3192bfc9ba942da56619f /fs/lockd/svclock.c | |
parent | [PATCH] knfsd: make nlmclnt_next_cookie SMP safe (diff) | |
download | kernel-qcow2-linux-39be4502cb75dc26007fe1659735b26c8e63fcc6.tar.gz kernel-qcow2-linux-39be4502cb75dc26007fe1659735b26c8e63fcc6.tar.xz kernel-qcow2-linux-39be4502cb75dc26007fe1659735b26c8e63fcc6.zip |
[PATCH] knfsd: match GRANTED_RES replies using cookies
When we send a GRANTED_MSG call, we current copy the NLM cookie provided in
the original LOCK call - because in 1996, some broken clients seemed to rely
on this bug. However, this means the cookies are not unique, so that when the
client's GRANTED_RES message comes back, we cannot simply match it based on
the cookie, but have to use the client's IP address in addition. Which breaks
when you have a multi-homed NFS client.
The X/Open spec explicitly mentions that clients should not expect the same
cookie; so one may hope that any clients that were broken in 1996 have either
been fixed or rendered obsolete.
Signed-off-by: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/lockd/svclock.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/lockd/svclock.c | 24 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c index 1f91567a1b88..3d2b8a831be5 100644 --- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c +++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c @@ -139,19 +139,19 @@ static inline int nlm_cookie_match(struct nlm_cookie *a, struct nlm_cookie *b) * Find a block with a given NLM cookie. */ static inline struct nlm_block * -nlmsvc_find_block(struct nlm_cookie *cookie, struct sockaddr_in *sin) +nlmsvc_find_block(struct nlm_cookie *cookie) { struct nlm_block *block; list_for_each_entry(block, &nlm_blocked, b_list) { - if (nlm_cookie_match(&block->b_call->a_args.cookie,cookie) - && nlm_cmp_addr(sin, &block->b_host->h_addr)) + if (nlm_cookie_match(&block->b_call->a_args.cookie,cookie)) goto found; } return NULL; found: + dprintk("nlmsvc_find_block(%s): block=%p\n", nlmdbg_cookie2a(cookie), block); kref_get(&block->b_count); return block; } @@ -165,6 +165,11 @@ found: * request, but (as I found out later) that's because some implementations * do just this. Never mind the standards comittees, they support our * logging industries. + * + * 10 years later: I hope we can safely ignore these old and broken + * clients by now. Let's fix this so we can uniquely identify an incoming + * GRANTED_RES message by cookie, without having to rely on the client's IP + * address. --okir */ static inline struct nlm_block * nlmsvc_create_block(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file, @@ -197,7 +202,7 @@ nlmsvc_create_block(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file, /* Set notifier function for VFS, and init args */ call->a_args.lock.fl.fl_flags |= FL_SLEEP; call->a_args.lock.fl.fl_lmops = &nlmsvc_lock_operations; - call->a_args.cookie = *cookie; /* see above */ + nlmclnt_next_cookie(&call->a_args.cookie); dprintk("lockd: created block %p...\n", block); @@ -640,17 +645,14 @@ static const struct rpc_call_ops nlmsvc_grant_ops = { * block. */ void -nlmsvc_grant_reply(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_cookie *cookie, u32 status) +nlmsvc_grant_reply(struct nlm_cookie *cookie, u32 status) { struct nlm_block *block; - struct nlm_file *file; - dprintk("grant_reply: looking for cookie %x, host (%08x), s=%d \n", - *(unsigned int *)(cookie->data), - ntohl(rqstp->rq_addr.sin_addr.s_addr), status); - if (!(block = nlmsvc_find_block(cookie, &rqstp->rq_addr))) + dprintk("grant_reply: looking for cookie %x, s=%d \n", + *(unsigned int *)(cookie->data), status); + if (!(block = nlmsvc_find_block(cookie))) return; - file = block->b_file; if (block) { if (status == NLM_LCK_DENIED_GRACE_PERIOD) { |