diff options
author | rodrigosiqueira | 2017-12-15 15:06:03 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar | 2018-01-10 11:30:27 +0100 |
commit | 31cb1bc0dc94882a588930f4d007b570c481fd17 (patch) | |
tree | c8d0e65b5cb86edc6d78376d12efeaa5bd45132a /kernel/sched | |
parent | Merge branch 'sched/urgent' into sched/core, to pick up fixes (diff) | |
download | kernel-qcow2-linux-31cb1bc0dc94882a588930f4d007b570c481fd17.tar.gz kernel-qcow2-linux-31cb1bc0dc94882a588930f4d007b570c481fd17.tar.xz kernel-qcow2-linux-31cb1bc0dc94882a588930f4d007b570c481fd17.zip |
sched/core: Rework and clarify prepare_lock_switch()
The prepare_lock_switch() function has an unused parameter, and also the
function name was not descriptive. To improve readability and remove
the extra parameter, do the following changes:
* Move prepare_lock_switch() from kernel/sched/sched.h to
kernel/sched/core.c, rename it to prepare_task(), and remove the
unused parameter.
* Split the smp_store_release() out from finish_lock_switch() to a
function named finish_task.
* Comments ajdustments.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171215140603.gxe5i2y6fg5ojfpp@smtp.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/core.c | 53 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/sched.h | 41 |
2 files changed, 49 insertions, 45 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 644fa2e3d993..a794f8155cd5 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -2045,7 +2045,7 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags) * If the owning (remote) CPU is still in the middle of schedule() with * this task as prev, wait until its done referencing the task. * - * Pairs with the smp_store_release() in finish_lock_switch(). + * Pairs with the smp_store_release() in finish_task(). * * This ensures that tasks getting woken will be fully ordered against * their previous state and preserve Program Order. @@ -2571,6 +2571,50 @@ fire_sched_out_preempt_notifiers(struct task_struct *curr, #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS */ +static inline void prepare_task(struct task_struct *next) +{ +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP + /* + * Claim the task as running, we do this before switching to it + * such that any running task will have this set. + */ + next->on_cpu = 1; +#endif +} + +static inline void finish_task(struct task_struct *prev) +{ +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP + /* + * After ->on_cpu is cleared, the task can be moved to a different CPU. + * We must ensure this doesn't happen until the switch is completely + * finished. + * + * In particular, the load of prev->state in finish_task_switch() must + * happen before this. + * + * Pairs with the smp_cond_load_acquire() in try_to_wake_up(). + */ + smp_store_release(&prev->on_cpu, 0); +#endif +} + +static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq) +{ +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK + /* this is a valid case when another task releases the spinlock */ + rq->lock.owner = current; +#endif + /* + * If we are tracking spinlock dependencies then we have to + * fix up the runqueue lock - which gets 'carried over' from + * prev into current: + */ + spin_acquire(&rq->lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_); + + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock); +} + /** * prepare_task_switch - prepare to switch tasks * @rq: the runqueue preparing to switch @@ -2591,7 +2635,7 @@ prepare_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, sched_info_switch(rq, prev, next); perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next); fire_sched_out_preempt_notifiers(prev, next); - prepare_lock_switch(rq, next); + prepare_task(next); prepare_arch_switch(next); } @@ -2646,7 +2690,7 @@ static struct rq *finish_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev) * the scheduled task must drop that reference. * * We must observe prev->state before clearing prev->on_cpu (in - * finish_lock_switch), otherwise a concurrent wakeup can get prev + * finish_task), otherwise a concurrent wakeup can get prev * running on another CPU and we could rave with its RUNNING -> DEAD * transition, resulting in a double drop. */ @@ -2663,7 +2707,8 @@ static struct rq *finish_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev) * to use. */ smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); - finish_lock_switch(rq, prev); + finish_task(prev); + finish_lock_switch(rq); finish_arch_post_lock_switch(); fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers(current); diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index b19552a212de..43f5d6e936bb 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -1328,47 +1328,6 @@ static inline int task_on_rq_migrating(struct task_struct *p) # define finish_arch_post_lock_switch() do { } while (0) #endif -static inline void prepare_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next) -{ -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP - /* - * We can optimise this out completely for !SMP, because the - * SMP rebalancing from interrupt is the only thing that cares - * here. - */ - next->on_cpu = 1; -#endif -} - -static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) -{ -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP - /* - * After ->on_cpu is cleared, the task can be moved to a different CPU. - * We must ensure this doesn't happen until the switch is completely - * finished. - * - * In particular, the load of prev->state in finish_task_switch() must - * happen before this. - * - * Pairs with the smp_cond_load_acquire() in try_to_wake_up(). - */ - smp_store_release(&prev->on_cpu, 0); -#endif -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK - /* this is a valid case when another task releases the spinlock */ - rq->lock.owner = current; -#endif - /* - * If we are tracking spinlock dependencies then we have to - * fix up the runqueue lock - which gets 'carried over' from - * prev into current: - */ - spin_acquire(&rq->lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_); - - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock); -} - /* * wake flags */ |