summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/workqueue.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTejun Heo2013-03-12 19:30:04 +0100
committerTejun Heo2013-03-12 19:30:04 +0100
commitc9178087acd71b4ea010ea48e147cf66952d2da9 (patch)
tree0b226a810036ee110d0f894c821df50df64db29b /kernel/workqueue.c
parentworkqueue: prepare flush_workqueue() for dynamic creation and destrucion of u... (diff)
downloadkernel-qcow2-linux-c9178087acd71b4ea010ea48e147cf66952d2da9.tar.gz
kernel-qcow2-linux-c9178087acd71b4ea010ea48e147cf66952d2da9.tar.xz
kernel-qcow2-linux-c9178087acd71b4ea010ea48e147cf66952d2da9.zip
workqueue: perform non-reentrancy test when queueing to unbound workqueues too
Because per-cpu workqueues have multiple pwqs (pool_workqueues) to serve the CPUs, to guarantee that a single work item isn't queued on one pwq while still executing another, __queue_work() takes a look at the previous pool the target work item was on and if it's still executing there, queue the work item on that pool. To support changing workqueue_attrs on the fly, unbound workqueues too will have multiple pwqs and thus need non-reentrancy test when queueing. This patch modifies __queue_work() such that the reentrancy test is performed regardless of the workqueue type. per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu) used to be used to determine the matching pwq for the last pool. This can't be used for unbound workqueues and is replaced with worker->current_pwq which also happens to be simpler. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/workqueue.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/workqueue.c42
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index e933979678e5..16fb6747276a 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1209,6 +1209,7 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
struct work_struct *work)
{
struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
+ struct worker_pool *last_pool;
struct list_head *worklist;
unsigned int work_flags;
unsigned int req_cpu = cpu;
@@ -1228,41 +1229,36 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_chained_work(wq)))
return;
- /* determine the pwq to use */
+ /* pwq which will be used unless @work is executing elsewhere */
if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)) {
- struct worker_pool *last_pool;
-
if (cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
-
- /*
- * It's multi cpu. If @work was previously on a different
- * cpu, it might still be running there, in which case the
- * work needs to be queued on that cpu to guarantee
- * non-reentrancy.
- */
pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
- last_pool = get_work_pool(work);
+ } else {
+ pwq = first_pwq(wq);
+ }
- if (last_pool && last_pool != pwq->pool) {
- struct worker *worker;
+ /*
+ * If @work was previously on a different pool, it might still be
+ * running there, in which case the work needs to be queued on that
+ * pool to guarantee non-reentrancy.
+ */
+ last_pool = get_work_pool(work);
+ if (last_pool && last_pool != pwq->pool) {
+ struct worker *worker;
- spin_lock(&last_pool->lock);
+ spin_lock(&last_pool->lock);
- worker = find_worker_executing_work(last_pool, work);
+ worker = find_worker_executing_work(last_pool, work);
- if (worker && worker->current_pwq->wq == wq) {
- pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, last_pool->cpu);
- } else {
- /* meh... not running there, queue here */
- spin_unlock(&last_pool->lock);
- spin_lock(&pwq->pool->lock);
- }
+ if (worker && worker->current_pwq->wq == wq) {
+ pwq = worker->current_pwq;
} else {
+ /* meh... not running there, queue here */
+ spin_unlock(&last_pool->lock);
spin_lock(&pwq->pool->lock);
}
} else {
- pwq = first_pwq(wq);
spin_lock(&pwq->pool->lock);
}