Bluetooth: Don't use remote address type to decide IRK persistency

There are LE devices on the market that start off by announcing their
public address and then once paired switch to using private address.
To be interoperable with such devices we should simply trust the fact
that we're receiving an IRK from them to indicate that they may use
private addresses in the future. Instead, simply tie the persistency
to the bonding/no-bonding information the same way as for LTKs and
CSRKs.

Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 16 deletions

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c b/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
index c4fe2fee753f..33a8564397b4 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
@@ -7873,27 +7873,13 @@ void mgmt_new_ltk(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct smp_ltk *key, bool persistent)
 	mgmt_event(MGMT_EV_NEW_LONG_TERM_KEY, hdev, &ev, sizeof(ev), NULL);
 }
 
-void mgmt_new_irk(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct smp_irk *irk)
+void mgmt_new_irk(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct smp_irk *irk, bool persistent)
 {
 	struct mgmt_ev_new_irk ev;
 
 	memset(&ev, 0, sizeof(ev));
 
-	/* For identity resolving keys from devices that are already
-	 * using a public address or static random address, do not
-	 * ask for storing this key. The identity resolving key really
-	 * is only mandatory for devices using resolvable random
-	 * addresses.
-	 *
-	 * Storing all identity resolving keys has the downside that
-	 * they will be also loaded on next boot of they system. More
-	 * identity resolving keys, means more time during scanning is
-	 * needed to actually resolve these addresses.
-	 */
-	if (bacmp(&irk->rpa, BDADDR_ANY))
-		ev.store_hint = 0x01;
-	else
-		ev.store_hint = 0x00;
+	ev.store_hint = persistent;
 
 	bacpy(&ev.rpa, &irk->rpa);
 	bacpy(&ev.irk.addr.bdaddr, &irk->bdaddr);