summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* arm: remove several unnecessary module.h include instancesPaul Gortmaker2011-11-011-1/+0Star
| | | | | | | | | | | | Building these files does not reveal a hidden need for any of these. Since module.h brings in the whole kitchen sink, it just needlessly adds 30k+ lines to the cpp burden. There are probably lots more, but ARM files of mach-* and plat-* don't get coverage via a simple yesconfig build. They will have to be cleaned up and tested via using their respective configs. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
* ARM: vfp: Fix the comment to make it consistent with the code.Santosh Shilimkar2011-09-231-1/+1
| | | | | | | Function vfp_force_reload() clears vfp_current_hw_state, so update the comment accordingly. Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
* ARM: vfp: Use cpu pm notifiers to save vfp stateColin Cross2011-09-231-8/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | When the cpu is powered down in a low power mode, the vfp registers may be reset. This patch uses CPU_PM_ENTER and CPU_PM_EXIT notifiers to save and restore the cpu's vfp registers. Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Tested-and-Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
* Merge branch 'devel-stable' into for-nextRussell King2011-07-231-2/+4
|\ | | | | | | | | Conflicts: arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
| * ARM: vfp: add VFPv4 capability detection and populate elf_hwcapWill Deacon2011-07-071-2/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The presence of VFPv4 cannot be detected simply by looking at the FPSID subarchitecture field, as a value >= 2 signifies the architecture as VFPv3 or later. This patch reads from MVFR1 to check whether or not the fused multiply accumulate instructions are supported. Since these are introduced with VFPv4, this tells us what we need to know. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
* | ARM: vfp: ensure that thread flushing works if preemptedRussell King2011-07-091-10/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Prevent a preemption event causing the initialized VFP state being overwritten by ensuring that the VFP hardware access is disabled prior to starting initialization. We can then do this in safety while still allowing preemption to occur. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* | ARM: vfp: fix a hole in VFP thread migrationRussell King2011-07-091-46/+52
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fix a hole in the VFP thread migration. Lets define two threads. Thread 1, we'll call 'interesting_thread' which is a thread which is running on CPU0, using VFP (so vfp_current_hw_state[0] = &interesting_thread->vfpstate) and gets migrated off to CPU1, where it continues execution of VFP instructions. Thread 2, we'll call 'new_cpu0_thread' which is the thread which takes over on CPU0. This has also been using VFP, and last used VFP on CPU0, but doesn't use it again. The following code will be executed twice: cpu = thread->cpu; /* * On SMP, if VFP is enabled, save the old state in * case the thread migrates to a different CPU. The * restoring is done lazily. */ if ((fpexc & FPEXC_EN) && vfp_current_hw_state[cpu]) { vfp_save_state(vfp_current_hw_state[cpu], fpexc); vfp_current_hw_state[cpu]->hard.cpu = cpu; } /* * Thread migration, just force the reloading of the * state on the new CPU in case the VFP registers * contain stale data. */ if (thread->vfpstate.hard.cpu != cpu) vfp_current_hw_state[cpu] = NULL; The first execution will be on CPU0 to switch away from 'interesting_thread'. interesting_thread->cpu will be 0. So, vfp_current_hw_state[0] points at interesting_thread->vfpstate. The hardware state will be saved, along with the CPU number (0) that it was executing on. 'thread' will be 'new_cpu0_thread' with new_cpu0_thread->cpu = 0. Also, because it was executing on CPU0, new_cpu0_thread->vfpstate.hard.cpu = 0, and so the thread migration check is not triggered. This means that vfp_current_hw_state[0] remains pointing at interesting_thread. The second execution will be on CPU1 to switch _to_ 'interesting_thread'. So, 'thread' will be 'interesting_thread' and interesting_thread->cpu now will be 1. The previous thread executing on CPU1 is not relevant to this so we shall ignore that. We get to the thread migration check. Here, we discover that interesting_thread->vfpstate.hard.cpu = 0, yet interesting_thread->cpu is now 1, indicating thread migration. We set vfp_current_hw_state[1] to NULL. So, at this point vfp_current_hw_state[] contains the following: [0] = &interesting_thread->vfpstate [1] = NULL Our interesting thread now executes a VFP instruction, takes a fault which loads the state into the VFP hardware. Now, through the assembly we now have: [0] = &interesting_thread->vfpstate [1] = &interesting_thread->vfpstate CPU1 stops due to ptrace (and so saves its VFP state) using the thread switch code above), and CPU0 calls vfp_sync_hwstate(). if (vfp_current_hw_state[cpu] == &thread->vfpstate) { vfp_save_state(&thread->vfpstate, fpexc | FPEXC_EN); BANG, we corrupt interesting_thread's VFP state by overwriting the more up-to-date state saved by CPU1 with the old VFP state from CPU0. Fix this by ensuring that we have sane semantics for the various state describing variables: 1. vfp_current_hw_state[] points to the current owner of the context information stored in each CPUs hardware, or NULL if that state information is invalid. 2. thread->vfpstate.hard.cpu always contains the most recent CPU number which the state was loaded into or NR_CPUS if no CPU owns the state. So, for a particular CPU to be a valid owner of the VFP state for a particular thread t, two things must be true: vfp_current_hw_state[cpu] == &t->vfpstate && t->vfpstate.hard.cpu == cpu. and that is valid from the moment a CPU loads the saved VFP context into the hardware. This gives clear and consistent semantics to interpreting these variables. This patch also fixes thread copying, ensuring that t->vfpstate.hard.cpu is invalidated, otherwise CPU0 may believe it was the last owner. The hole can happen thus: - thread1 runs on CPU2 using VFP, migrates to CPU3, exits and thread_info freed. - New thread allocated from a previously running thread on CPU2, reusing memory for thread1 and copying vfp.hard.cpu. At this point, the following are true: new_thread1->vfpstate.hard.cpu == 2 &new_thread1->vfpstate == vfp_current_hw_state[2] Lastly, this also addresses thread flushing in a similar way to thread copying. Hole is: - thread runs on CPU0, using VFP, migrates to CPU1 but does not use VFP. - thread calls execve(), so thread flush happens, leaving vfp_current_hw_state[0] intact. This vfpstate is memset to 0 causing thread->vfpstate.hard.cpu = 0. - thread migrates back to CPU0 before using VFP. At this point, the following are true: thread->vfpstate.hard.cpu == 0 &thread->vfpstate == vfp_current_hw_state[0] Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* | ARM: vfp: rename last_VFP_context to vfp_current_hw_stateRussell King2011-07-091-15/+21
|/ | | | | | | | | Rename the slightly confusing 'last_VFP_context' variable to be more descriptive of what it actually is. This variable stores a pointer to the current owner's vfpstate structure for the context held in the VFP hardware. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* ARM: Use struct syscore_ops instead of sysdevs for PM in common codeRafael J. Wysocki2011-04-241-14/+5Star
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Convert some ARM architecture's common code to using struct syscore_ops objects for power management instead of sysdev classes and sysdevs. This simplifies the code and reduces the kernel's memory footprint. It also is necessary for removing sysdevs from the kernel entirely in the future. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
* ARM: 6868/1: Preserve the VFP state during forkCatalin Marinas2011-04-101-0/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | VFP registers d16-d31 are callee saved registers and must be preserved during function calls, including fork(). The VFP configuration should also be preserved. The patch copies the full VFP state to the child process. Reported-by: Paul Wright <paul.wright@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* ARM: 6867/1: Introduce THREAD_NOTIFY_COPY for copy_thread() hooksCatalin Marinas2011-04-101-7/+15
| | | | | | | | | This patch adds THREAD_NOTIFY_COPY for calling registered handlers during the copy_thread() function call. It also changes the VFP handler to use a switch statement rather than if..else and ignore this event. Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* ARM: vfp: improve commentry for hotplug eventsRussell King2011-02-231-2/+5
| | | | | | | | Improve the documentation for the VFP hotplug notifier handler, so that people better understand what's going on there and what has been done for them. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* ARM: fix some sparse errors in generic ARM codeRussell King2011-02-231-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c:37:6: warning: symbol 'return_address' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/kernel/setup.c:76:14: warning: symbol 'processor_id' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/kernel/traps.c:259:1: warning: symbol 'die_lock' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c:156:6: warning: symbol 'vfp_raise_sigfpe' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* ARM: VFP: re-initialize VFP coprocessor access enables on CPU hotplugRussell King2010-12-201-1/+23
| | | | | | | | | We can not guarantee that VFP will be enabled when CPU hotplug brings a CPU back online from a reset state. Add a hotplug CPU notifier to ensure that the VFP coprocessor access is enabled whenever a CPU comes back online. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* ARM: 6203/1: Make VFPv3 usable on ARMv6Tony Lindgren2010-07-091-3/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | MVFR0 and MVFR1 are only available starting with ARM1136 r1p0 release according to "B.5 VFP changes" in DDI0211F_arm1136_r1p0_trm.pdf. This is also when TLS register got added, so we can use HAS_TLS also to test for MVFR0 and MVFR1. Otherwise VFPFMRX and VFPFMXR access fails and we get: Internal error: Oops - undefined instruction: 0 [#1] PC is at no_old_VFP_process+0x8/0x3c LR is at __und_svc+0x48/0x80 ... Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* ARM: 6050/1: VFP: fix the SMP versions of vfp_{sync,flush}_hwstateImre Deak2010-04-141-21/+10Star
| | | | | | | | | | | From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@nokia.com> Recently the UP versions of these functions were refactored and as a side effect it became possible to call them for the current thread. This isn't true for the SMP versions however, so fix this up. Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* ARM: 5997/1: ARM: Correct the VFPv3 detectionCatalin Marinas2010-03-281-1/+1
| | | | | | | | A CPU has VFPv3 hardware if the FPSID[19:16] bits are 2 or more. Currently Linux was only checking for 3 or more. Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* Merge branch 'for-linus' of master.kernel.org:/home/rmk/linux-2.6-armLinus Torvalds2010-03-011-19/+36
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * 'for-linus' of master.kernel.org:/home/rmk/linux-2.6-arm: (100 commits) ARM: Eliminate decompressor -Dstatic= PIC hack ARM: 5958/1: ARM: U300: fix inverted clk round rate ARM: 5956/1: misplaced parentheses ARM: 5955/1: ep93xx: move timer defines into core.c and document ARM: 5954/1: ep93xx: move gpio interrupt support to gpio.c ARM: 5953/1: ep93xx: fix broken build of clock.c ARM: 5952/1: ARM: MM: Add ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT_6 for handle inside each ARCH Kconfig ARM: 5949/1: NUC900 add gpio virtual memory map ARM: 5948/1: Enable timer0 to time4 clock support for nuc910 ARM: 5940/2: ARM: MMCI: remove custom DBG macro and printk ARM: make_coherent(): fix problems with highpte, part 2 MM: Pass a PTE pointer to update_mmu_cache() rather than the PTE itself ARM: 5945/1: ep93xx: include correct irq.h in core.c ARM: 5933/1: amba-pl011: support hardware flow control ARM: 5930/1: Add PKMAP area description to memory.txt. ARM: 5929/1: Add checks to detect overlap of memory regions. ARM: 5928/1: Change type of VMALLOC_END to unsigned long. ARM: 5927/1: Make delimiters of DMA area globally visibly. ARM: 5926/1: Add "Virtual kernel memory..." printout. ARM: 5920/1: OMAP4: Enable L2 Cache ... Fix up trivial conflict in arch/arm/mach-mx25/clock.c
| * ARM: vfp ptrace: no point flushing hw context for PTRACE_GETVFPREGSRussell King2010-02-151-2/+23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If we're only reading the VFP context via the ptrace call, there's no need to invalidate the hardware context - we only need to do that on PTRACE_SETVFPREGS. This allows more efficient monitoring of a traced task. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
| * ARM: vfp: fix vfp_sync_state()Russell King2010-02-151-20/+16Star
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The more I look at vfp_sync_state(), the more I believe it's trying to do its job in a really obscure way. Essentially, last_VFP_context[] tracks who owns the state in the VFP hardware. If last_VFP_context[] is the context for the thread which we're interested in, then the VFP hardware has context which is not saved in the software state - so we need to bring the software state up to date. If last_VFP_context[] is for some other thread, we really don't care what state the VFP hardware is in; it doesn't contain any information pertinent to the thread we're trying to deal with - so don't touch the hardware. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* | ARM: 5909/1: ARM: Correct the FPSCR bits setting when raising exceptionsCatalin Marinas2010-02-011-1/+4
|/ | | | | | | | | | | Commit c98929c07a removed the clearing of the FPSCR[31:28] bits from the vfp_raise_exceptions() function and the new bits are or'ed with the old FPSCR bits leading to unexpected results (the original commit was referring to the cumulative bits - FPSCR[4:0]). Reported-by: Tom Hameenanttila <tmhameen@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* ARM: Convert VFP/Crunch/XscaleCP thread_release() to exit_thread()Russell King2009-12-181-8/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This avoids races in the VFP code where the dead thread may have state on another CPU. By moving this code to exit_thread(), we will be running as the thread, and therefore be running on the current CPU. This means that we can ensure that the only local state is accessed in the thread notifiers. Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* ARM: VFP: fix vfp thread init bug and document vfp notifier entry conditionsRussell King2009-12-131-21/+62
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When the VFP notifier is called for flush_thread(), we may be preemptible, meaning we might migrate to another CPU, which means referencing the current CPU number without some form of locking is invalid, and can cause data corruption. For the most cases, this isn't a problem since atomic notifiers are run under rcu lock, which for most configurations results in preemption being disabled - except when the preemptable tree-based rcu implementation is selected. Let's make it safe anyway. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* Fix the VFP handling on the Feroceon CPUCatalin Marinas2009-05-301-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This CPU generates synchronous VFP exceptions in a non-standard way - the FPEXC.EX bit set but without the FPSCR.IXE bit being set like in the VFP subarchitecture 1 or just the FPEXC.DEX bit like in VFP subarchitecture 2. The main problem is that the faulty instruction (which needs to be emulated in software) will be restarted several times (normally until a context switch disables the VFP). This patch ensures that the VFP exception is treated as synchronous. Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
* [ARM] 5440/1: Fix VFP state corruption due to preemption during VFP exceptionsGeorge G. Davis2009-04-011-2/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We've observed that ARM VFP state can be corrupted during VFP exception handling when PREEMPT is enabled. The exact conditions are difficult to reproduce but appear to occur during VFP exception handling when a task causes a VFP exception which is handled via VFP_bounce and is then preempted by yet another task which in turn causes yet another VFP exception. Since the VFP_bounce code is not preempt safe, VFP state then becomes corrupt. In order to prevent preemption from occuring while handling a VFP exception, this patch disables preemption while handling VFP exceptions. Signed-off-by: George G. Davis <gdavis@mvista.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] 5388/1: Add hwcap bits for VFPv3 and VFPv3D16Catalin Marinas2009-02-121-0/+12
| | | | | | | | | | The VFPv3D16 is a VFPv3 CPU configuration where only 16 double registers are present, as the VFPv2 configuration. This patch adds the corresponding hwcap bits so that applications or debuggers have more information about the supported features. Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] 5387/1: Add ptrace VFP support on ARMCatalin Marinas2009-02-121-0/+49
| | | | | | | | | | | | This patch adds ptrace support for setting and getting the VFP registers using PTRACE_SETVFPREGS and PTRACE_GETVFPREGS. The user_vfp structure defined in asm/user.h contains 32 double registers (to cover VFPv3 and Neon hardware) and the FPSCR register. Cc: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] 5349/1: VFP: Add PM code to save and restore current VFP stateBen Dooks2008-12-181-0/+56
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When CONFIG_PM is selected, the VFP code does not have any handler installed to deal with either saving the VFP state of the current task, nor does it do anything to try and restore the VFP after a resume. On resume, the VFP will have been reset and the co-processor access control registers are in an indeterminate state (very probably the CP10 and CP11 the VFP uses will have been disabled by the ARM core reset). When this happens, resume will break as soon as it tries to unfreeze the tasks and restart scheduling. Add a sys device to allow us to hook the suspend call to save the current thread state if the thread is using VFP and a resume hook which restores the CP10/CP11 access and ensures the VFP is disabled so that the lazy swapping will take place on next access. Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* Add HWCAP_NEON to the ARM hwcap.h fileCatalin Marinas2008-11-061-0/+9
| | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
* smp_call_function: get rid of the unused nonatomic/retry argumentJens Axboe2008-06-261-1/+1
| | | | | | | | It's never used and the comments refer to nonatomic and retry interchangably. So get rid of it. Acked-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
* [ARM] 4582/2: Add support for the common VFP subarchitectureCatalin Marinas2008-01-261-43/+55
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch allows the VFP support code to run correctly on CPUs compatible with the common VFP subarchitecture specification (Appendix B in the ARM ARM v7-A and v7-R edition). It implements support for VFP subarchitecture 2 while being backwards compatible with subarchitecture 1. On VFP subarchitecture 1, the arithmetic exceptions are asynchronous (or imprecise as described in the old ARM ARM) unless the FPSCR.IXE bit is 1. The exceptional instructions can be read from FPINST and FPINST2 registers. With VFP subarchitecture 2, the arithmetic exceptions can also be synchronous and marked by the FPEXC.DEX bit (the FPEXC.EX bit is cleared). CPUs implementing the synchronous arithmetic exceptions don't have the FPINST and FPINST2 registers and accessing them would trigger and undefined exception. Note that FPEXC.EX bit has an additional meaning on subarchitecture 1 - if it isn't set, there is no additional information in FPINST and FPINST2 that needs to be saved at context switch or when lazy-loading the VFP state of a different thread. The patch also removes the clearing of the cumulative exception flags in FPSCR when additional exceptions were raised. It is up to the user application to clear these bits. Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] 4629/1: Fix VFP emulation code to clear all exception flags of FPEXCTakashi Ohmasa2007-10-211-1/+1
| | | | | | | | All exception flags of the FPEXC register must be cleared before returning from exception code to user code, including FP2V and OFC. Signed-off-by: Takashi Ohmasa <ohmasa.takashi@jp.panasonic.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] 4567/1: Fix 'Oops - undefined instruction' when CONFIG_VFP=y on non ↵Tzachi Perelstein2007-09-131-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | VFP device vfp_init() takes care of the condition when CONFIG_VFP=y but no real VFP device exists. However, when this condition is true, a compiler might misplace code lines in a way that will break this support. (To be more specific - fmrx(FPSID) might be executed before vfp_testing_entry assignment, which will end up with Oops - undefined instruction). This patch adds a barrier() to guarantee the right execution ordering. Signed-off-by: Assaf Hoffman Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] vfp: make fpexc bit names less verboseRussell King2007-07-201-6/+6
| | | | | | | Use the fpexc abbreviated names instead of long verbose names for fpexc bits. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] VFP: fix section mismatch errorRussell King2007-06-101-1/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | Fix a real section mismatch issue; the test code is thrown away after initialisation, but if we do not detect the VFP hardware, it is left hooked into the exception handler. Any VFP instructions which are subsequently executed risk calling the discarded exception handler. Introduce a new "null" handler which returns to the "unrecognised fault" return address. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] 4111/1: Allow VFP to work with thread migration on SMPCatalin Marinas2007-01-251-4/+26
| | | | | | | | | | The current lazy saving of the VFP registers is no longer possible with thread migration on SMP. This patch implements a per-CPU vfp-state pointer and the saving of the VFP registers at every context switch. The registers restoring is still performed in a lazy way. Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] Fix VFP initialisation issue for SMP systemsRussell King2007-01-031-0/+15
| | | | | | | | When we install the handlers for context switching, we must enable VFP on all CPU cores, otherwise undefined (and random) effects occur. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] Handle HWCAP_VFP in VFP support codeRussell King2006-12-081-1/+25
| | | | | | | | | | | | Don't set HWCAP_VFP in the processor support file; not only does it depend on the processor features, but it also depends on the support code being present. Therefore, only set it if the support code detects that we have a VFP coprocessor attached. Also, move the VFP handling of the coprocessor access register into the VFP support code. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] 3900/1: Fix VFP Division by Zero exception handling.Takashi Ohmasa2006-10-281-0/+1
| | | | | | | The SIGFPE signal should be generated if Division by Zero exception is detected. Signed-off-by: Takashi Ohmasa <ohmasa.takashi@jp.panasonic.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [PATCH] arm __user annotationsAl Viro2006-10-111-1/+1
| | | | | Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* [ARM] Optimise VFP thread notify function a littleRussell King2006-09-201-24/+16Star
| | | | | | | | The common case for the thread notifier is a context switch. Tell gcc that this is the most likely condition so it can optimise the function for this case. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] 3748/3: Correct error check in vfp_raise_exceptionsDaniel Jacobowitz2006-08-271-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | Patch from Daniel Jacobowitz The recent fix to hide VFP_NAN_FLAG broke the check in vfp_raise_exceptions; it would attempt to deliver an exception mask of 0xfffffeff instead of reporting a serious error condition using printk. Define a safe constant to use for an invalid exception maskm, and use it at both ends. Signed-off-by: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* Remove obsolete #include <linux/config.h>Jörn Engel2006-06-301-1/+0Star
| | | | | Signed-off-by: Jörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
* [ARM] Add thread_notify infrastructureRussell King2006-06-221-25/+46
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Some machine classes need to allow VFP support to be built into the kernel, but still allow the kernel to run even though VFP isn't present. Unfortunately, the kernel hard-codes VFP instructions into the thread switch, which prevents this being run-time selectable. Solve this by introducing a notifier which things such as VFP can hook into to be informed of events which affect the VFP subsystem (eg, creation and destruction of threads, switches between threads.) Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] 3499/1: Fix VFP FPSCR corruption for double exception caseGeorge G. Davis2006-05-051-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Patch from George G. Davis The ARM VFP FPSCR register is corrupted when a condition flags modifying VFP instruction is followed by a non-condition flags modifying VFP instruction and both instructions raise exceptions. The fix is to read the current FPSCR in between emulation of these two instructions and use the current FPSCR value when handling the second exception. Signed-off-by: George G. Davis <gdavis@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] vfp: fix leak of VFP_NAN_FLAG into FPSCRRussell King2006-04-251-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | The VFP code can leak VFP_NAN_FLAG into the FPSCR. It doesn't correspond to any real FPSCR bit (and overlaps one of the exception flags). Bug report from Daniel Jacobowitz Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [PATCH] ARM: Don't force SIGFPERussell King2005-06-301-1/+1
| | | | | | | | We were forcing SIGFPE on to a user program for no good reason. Use send_sig_info() instead. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* Linux-2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds2005-04-171-0/+288
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
generated by cgit v1.2.3-55-g7522 (git 2.39.0) at 2024-07-12 12:35:13 +0200