summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* s390/spinlock: do not yield to a CPU in udelay/mdelayMartin Schwidefsky2015-11-271-8/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | It does not make sense to try to relinquish the time slice with diag 0x9c to a CPU in a state that does not allow to schedule the CPU. The scenario where this can happen is a CPU waiting in udelay/mdelay while holding a spin-lock. Add a CIF bit to tag a CPU in enabled wait and use it to detect that the yield of a CPU will not be successful and skip the diagnose call. Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* s390/spinlock: avoid diagnose loopMartin Schwidefsky2015-11-271-9/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The spinlock implementation calls the diagnose 0x9c / 0x44 immediately if the SIGP sense running reported the target CPU as not running. The diagnose 0x9c is a hint to the hypervisor to schedule the target CPU in preference to the source CPU that issued the diagnose. It can happen that on return from the diagnose the target CPU has not been scheduled yet, e.g. if the target logical CPU is on another physical CPU and the hypervisor did not want to migrate the logical CPU. Avoid the immediate repeat of the diagnose instruction, instead do the retry loop before the next invocation of diagnose 0x9c. Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* s390/spinlock: use correct barriersChristian Borntraeger2015-10-141-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | _raw_write_lock_wait first sets the high order bit to indicate a pending writer and then waits for the reader to drop to zero. smp_rmb by definition only orders reads against reads. Let's use a full smp_mb instead. As right now smp_rmb is implemented as full serialization, this needs no stable backport, but this patch will be necessary if we reimplement smp_rmb. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* s390/spinlock: add compare-and-delay to lock wait loopsMartin Schwidefsky2015-01-231-7/+45
| | | | | | | | | | | | Add the compare-and-delay instruction to the spin-lock and rw-lock retry loops. A CPU executing the compare-and-delay instruction stops until the lock value has changed. This is done to make the locking code for contended locks to behave better in regard to the multi- hreading facility. A thread of a core executing a compare-and-delay will allow the other threads of a core to get a larger share of the core resources. Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* s390/rwlock: use the interlocked-access facility 1 instructionsMartin Schwidefsky2014-09-251-0/+34
| | | | | | | Make use of the load-and-add, load-and-or and load-and-and instructions to atomically update the read-write lock without a compare-and-swap loop. Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* s390/rwlock: improve writer fairnessMartin Schwidefsky2014-09-251-5/+9
| | | | | | | | | Set the write-lock bit in the out-of-line rwlock code to indicate that a writer is waiting. Additional readers will no be able to get the lock until at least one writer got the lock. Additional writers have to wait for the first writer to release the lock again. Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* s390/rwlock: remove interrupt-enabling rwlock variant.Martin Schwidefsky2014-09-251-50/+0Star
| | | | Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* s390/rwlock: use directed yield for write-locked rwlocksMartin Schwidefsky2014-09-251-19/+30
| | | | | | | | | Add an owner field to the arch_rwlock_t to be able to pass the timeslice of a virtual CPU with diagnose 0x9c to the lock owner in case the rwlock is write-locked. The undirected yield in case the rwlock is acquired writable but the lock is read-locked is removed. Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* s390/spinlock: refactor arch_spin_lock_wait[_flags]Martin Schwidefsky2014-05-201-34/+47
| | | | | | Reorder the spinlock wait code to make it more readable. Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* s390/rwlock: add missing local_irq_restore callsMartin Schwidefsky2014-05-201-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | The out of line _raw_read_lock_wait_flags/_raw_write_lock_wait_flags functions for the arch_read_lock_flags/arch_write_lock_flags calls fail to re-enable the interrupts after another unsuccessful try to get the lock with compare-and-swap. The following wait would be done with interrupts disabled which is suboptimal. Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* s390/spinlock,rwlock: always to a load-and-test firstMartin Schwidefsky2014-05-201-13/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In case a lock is contended it is better to do a load-and-test first before trying to get the lock with compare-and-swap. This helps to avoid unnecessary cache invalidations of the cacheline for the lock if the CPU has to wait for the lock. For an uncontended lock doing the compare-and-swap directly is a bit better, if the CPU does not have the cacheline in its cache yet the compare-and-swap will get it read-write immediately while a load-and-test would get it read-only first. Always to the load-and-test first to avoid the cacheline invalidations for the contended case outweight the potential read-only to read-write cacheline upgrade for the uncontended case. Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* s390/spinlock: fix system hang with spin_retry <= 0Gerald Schaefer2014-05-201-6/+8
| | | | | | | | | | On LPAR, when spin_retry is set to <= 0, arch_spin_lock_wait() and arch_spin_lock_wait_flags() may end up in a while(1) loop w/o doing any compare and swap operation. To fix this, use do/while instead of for loop. Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* s390/spinlock: optimize spinlock code sequencePhilipp Hachtmann2014-05-201-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | Use lowcore constant to improve the code generated for spinlocks. [ Martin Schwidefsky: patch breakdown and code beautification ] Signed-off-by: Philipp Hachtmann <phacht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* s390/spinlock: cleanup spinlock codePhilipp Hachtmann2014-05-201-29/+26Star
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Improve the spinlock code in several aspects: - Have _raw_compare_and_swap return true if the operation has been successful instead of returning the old value. - Remove the "volatile" from arch_spinlock_t and arch_rwlock_t - Rename 'owner_cpu' to 'lock' - Add helper functions arch_spin_trylock_once / arch_spin_tryrelease_once [ Martin Schwidefsky: patch breakdown and code beautification ] Signed-off-by: Philipp Hachtmann <phacht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* s390/comments: unify copyright messages and remove file namesHeiko Carstens2012-07-201-2/+1Star
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Remove the file name from the comment at top of many files. In most cases the file name was wrong anyway, so it's rather pointless. Also unify the IBM copyright statement. We did have a lot of sightly different statements and wanted to change them one after another whenever a file gets touched. However that never happened. Instead people start to take the old/"wrong" statements to use as a template for new files. So unify all of them in one go. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
* [S390] rework smp codeMartin Schwidefsky2012-03-111-22/+8Star
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Define struct pcpu and merge some of the NR_CPUS arrays into it, including __cpu_logical_map, current_set and smp_cpu_state. Split smp related functions to those operating on physical cpus and the functions operating on a logical cpu number. Make the functions for physical cpus use a pointer to a struct pcpu. This hides the knowledge about cpu addresses in smp.c, entry[64].S and swsusp_asm64.S, thus remove the sigp.h header. The PSW restart mechanism is used to start secondary cpus, calling a function on an online cpu, calling a function on the ipl cpu, and for the nmi signal. Replace the different assembler functions with a single function restart_int_handler. The new entry point calls a function whose pointer is stored in the lowcore of the target cpu and it can wait for the source cpu to stop. This covers all existing use cases. Overall the code is now simpler and there are ~380 lines less code. Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* [S390] spinlock: check virtual cpu running statusGerald Schaefer2010-02-261-16/+37
| | | | | | | | | | | This patch introduces a new function that checks the running status of a cpu in a hypervisor. This status is not virtualized, so the check is only correct if running in an LPAR. On acquiring a spinlock, if the cpu holding the lock is scheduled by the hypervisor, we do a busy wait on the lock. If it is not scheduled, we yield over to that cpu. Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* [S390] Move __cpu_logical_map to smp.cHeiko Carstens2010-01-131-1/+1
| | | | | | | | Finally move it to the place where it belongs to and make get rid of it for !CONFIG_SMP. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* locking: Convert raw_rwlock functions to arch_rwlockThomas Gleixner2009-12-141-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | | Name space cleanup for rwlock functions. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
* locking: Convert raw_rwlock to arch_rwlockThomas Gleixner2009-12-141-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Not strictly necessary for -rt as -rt does not have non sleeping rwlocks, but it's odd to not have a consistent naming convention. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
* locking: Convert __raw_spin* functions to arch_spin*Thomas Gleixner2009-12-141-11/+11
| | | | | | | | | | Name space cleanup. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
* locking: Convert raw_spinlock to arch_spinlockThomas Gleixner2009-12-141-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The raw_spin* namespace was taken by lockdep for the architecture specific implementations. raw_spin_* would be the ideal name space for the spinlocks which are not converted to sleeping locks in preempt-rt. Linus suggested to convert the raw_ to arch_ locks and cleanup the name space instead of using an artifical name like core_spin, atomic_spin or whatever No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
* [S390] implement interrupt-enabling rwlocksHeiko Carstens2009-06-121-0/+40
| | | | | | | | arch backend for f5f7eac41db827a47b2163330eecd7bb55ae9f12 "Allow rwlocks to re-enable interrupts". Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* [S390] do local_irq_restore while spinning in spin_lock_irqsave.Hisashi Hifumi2008-01-261-0/+23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In s390's spin_lock_irqsave, interrupts remain disabled while spinning. In other architectures like x86 and powerpc, interrupts are re-enabled while spinning if IRQ is not masked before spin_lock_irqsave is called. The following patch re-enables interrupts through local_irq_restore while spinning for a lock acquisition. This can improve system response. [heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com: removed saving of pc] Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* [S390] Remove owner_pc member from raw_spinlock_t.Heiko Carstens2008-01-261-8/+4Star
| | | | | | | | | | Used to contain the address of the holder of the lock. But since the spinlock code is not inlined anymore all locks contain the same address anyway. And since in addtition nobody complained about that for ages its obviously unused. So remove it. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
* [PATCH] Directed yield: direct yield of spinlocks for s390.Martin Schwidefsky2006-10-011-23/+39
| | | | | | | | | | | Use the new diagnose 0x9c in the spinlock implementation for s390. It yields the remaining timeslice of the virtual cpu that tries to acquire a lock to the virtual cpu that is the current holder of the lock. Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* [PATCH] s390: Increase spinlock retry code performanceChristian Ehrhardt2006-03-101-2/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently the code tries up to spin_retry times to grab a lock using the cs instruction. The cs instruction has exclusive access to a memory region and therefore invalidates the appropiate cache line of all other cpus. If there is contention on a lock this leads to cache line trashing. This can be avoided if we first check wether a cs instruction is likely to succeed before the instruction gets actually executed. Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* [PATCH] s390: spinlock fixesMartin Schwidefsky2006-01-151-7/+0Star
| | | | | | | | Remove useless spin_retry_counter and fix compilation for UP kernels. Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* [PATCH] s390: cleanup KconfigMartin Schwidefsky2006-01-061-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | Sanitize some s390 Kconfig options. We have ARCH_S390, ARCH_S390X, ARCH_S390_31, 64BIT, S390_SUPPORT and COMPAT. Replace these 6 options by S390, 64BIT and COMPAT. Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* [PATCH] spinlock consolidationIngo Molnar2005-09-101-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch (written by me and also containing many suggestions of Arjan van de Ven) does a major cleanup of the spinlock code. It does the following things: - consolidates and enhances the spinlock/rwlock debugging code - simplifies the asm/spinlock.h files - encapsulates the raw spinlock type and moves generic spinlock features (such as ->break_lock) into the generic code. - cleans up the spinlock code hierarchy to get rid of the spaghetti. Most notably there's now only a single variant of the debugging code, located in lib/spinlock_debug.c. (previously we had one SMP debugging variant per architecture, plus a separate generic one for UP builds) Also, i've enhanced the rwlock debugging facility, it will now track write-owners. There is new spinlock-owner/CPU-tracking on SMP builds too. All locks have lockup detection now, which will work for both soft and hard spin/rwlock lockups. The arch-level include files now only contain the minimally necessary subset of the spinlock code - all the rest that can be generalized now lives in the generic headers: include/asm-i386/spinlock_types.h | 16 include/asm-x86_64/spinlock_types.h | 16 I have also split up the various spinlock variants into separate files, making it easier to see which does what. The new layout is: SMP | UP ----------------------------|----------------------------------- asm/spinlock_types_smp.h | linux/spinlock_types_up.h linux/spinlock_types.h | linux/spinlock_types.h asm/spinlock_smp.h | linux/spinlock_up.h linux/spinlock_api_smp.h | linux/spinlock_api_up.h linux/spinlock.h | linux/spinlock.h /* * here's the role of the various spinlock/rwlock related include files: * * on SMP builds: * * asm/spinlock_types.h: contains the raw_spinlock_t/raw_rwlock_t and the * initializers * * linux/spinlock_types.h: * defines the generic type and initializers * * asm/spinlock.h: contains the __raw_spin_*()/etc. lowlevel * implementations, mostly inline assembly code * * (also included on UP-debug builds:) * * linux/spinlock_api_smp.h: * contains the prototypes for the _spin_*() APIs. * * linux/spinlock.h: builds the final spin_*() APIs. * * on UP builds: * * linux/spinlock_type_up.h: * contains the generic, simplified UP spinlock type. * (which is an empty structure on non-debug builds) * * linux/spinlock_types.h: * defines the generic type and initializers * * linux/spinlock_up.h: * contains the __raw_spin_*()/etc. version of UP * builds. (which are NOPs on non-debug, non-preempt * builds) * * (included on UP-non-debug builds:) * * linux/spinlock_api_up.h: * builds the _spin_*() APIs. * * linux/spinlock.h: builds the final spin_*() APIs. */ All SMP and UP architectures are converted by this patch. arm, i386, ia64, ppc, ppc64, s390/s390x, x64 was build-tested via crosscompilers. m32r, mips, sh, sparc, have not been tested yet, but should be mostly fine. From: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org> Booted and lightly tested on a500-44 (64-bit, SMP kernel, dual CPU). Builds 32-bit SMP kernel (not booted or tested). I did not try to build non-SMP kernels. That should be trivial to fix up later if necessary. I converted bit ops atomic_hash lock to raw_spinlock_t. Doing so avoids some ugly nesting of linux/*.h and asm/*.h files. Those particular locks are well tested and contained entirely inside arch specific code. I do NOT expect any new issues to arise with them. If someone does ever need to use debug/metrics with them, then they will need to unravel this hairball between spinlocks, atomic ops, and bit ops that exist only because parisc has exactly one atomic instruction: LDCW (load and clear word). From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> ia64 fix Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org> Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se> Signed-off-by: Benoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* [PATCH] s390: spin lock retryMartin Schwidefsky2005-07-281-0/+133
Split spin lock and r/w lock implementation into a single try which is done inline and an out of line function that repeatedly tries to get the lock before doing the cpu_relax(). Add a system control to set the number of retries before a cpu is yielded. The reason for the spin lock retry is that the diagnose 0x44 that is used to give up the virtual cpu is quite expensive. For spin locks that are held only for a short period of time the costs of the diagnoses outweights the savings for spin locks that are held for a longer timer. The default retry count is 1000. Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>