summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Merge branch 'linus' into releaseLen Brown2011-03-231-0/+136
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | Conflicts: arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
| * Pull pstorev4 into release branchTony Luck2011-03-161-0/+136
| |\
| | * pstore: X86 platform interface using ACPI/APEI/ERSTTony Luck2011-01-031-0/+136
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The 'error record serialization table' in ACPI provides a suitable amount of persistent storage for use by the pstore filesystem. Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
* | | ACPI, APEI, Add ERST record ID cacheHuang Ying2011-03-221-44/+191
|/ / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | APEI ERST firmware interface and implementation has no multiple users in mind. For example, if there is four records in storage with ID: 1, 2, 3 and 4, if two ERST readers enumerate the records via GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID as follow, reader 1 reader 2 1 2 3 4 -1 -1 where -1 signals there is no more record ID. Reader 1 has no chance to check record 2 and 4, while reader 2 has no chance to check record 1 and 3. And any other GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID will return -1, that is, other readers will has no chance to check any record even they are not cleared by anyone. This makes raw GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID not suitable for used by multiple users. To solve the issue, an in-memory ERST record ID cache is designed and implemented. When enumerating record ID, the ID returned by GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID is added into cache in addition to be returned to caller. So other readers can check the cache to get all record ID available. Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* / Fix spelling mistakes in commentsStefan Weil2011-01-031-1/+1
|/ | | | | | | | | | | milisecond -> millisecond meassge -> message Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@adurom.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
* ACPI, APEI, use raw spinlock in ERSTHuang Ying2010-12-111-17/+17
| | | | | | | | | ERST writing may be used in NMI or Machine Check Exception handler. So it need to use raw spinlock instead of normal spinlock. This patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
*-. Merge branches 'apei', 'battery-mwh-fix', 'bugzilla-10807', ↵Len Brown2010-09-291-4/+21
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | 'bugzilla-14736', 'bugzilla-14679', 'bugzilla-16396', 'launchpad-613381' and 'misc' into release
| | * ACPI, APEI, Fix ERST MOVE_DATA instruction implementationHuang Ying2010-09-291-3/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The src_base and dst_base fields in apei_exec_context are physical address, so they should be ioremaped before being used in ERST MOVE_DATA instruction. Reported-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <martinez.javier@gmail.com> Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
| | * ACPI: Fix typosLucas De Marchi2010-09-291-1/+1
| |/ | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* / ACPI, APEI, Fix APEI related table size checkingHuang Ying2010-09-291-1/+3
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | On Huang Ying's machine: erst_tab->header_length == sizeof(struct acpi_table_einj) but Yinghai reported that on his machine, erst_tab->header_length == sizeof(struct acpi_table_einj) - sizeof(struct acpi_table_header) To make erst table size checking code works on all systems, both testing are treated as PASS. Same situation applies to einj_tab->header_length, so corresponding table size checking is changed in similar way too. v2: - Treat both table size as valid Originally-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* acpi: fix bogus preemption logicThomas Gleixner2010-08-121-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() logic was introduced in commit 8bd108d (ACPICA: add preemption point after each opcode parse). The follow up commits abe1dfab6, 138d15692, c084ca70 tried to fix the preemption logic back and forth, but nobody noticed that the usage of in_atomic_preempt_off() in that context is wrong. The check which guards the call of cond_resched() is: if (!in_atomic_preempt_off() && !irqs_disabled()) in_atomic_preempt_off() is not intended for general use as the comment above the macro definition clearly says: * Check whether we were atomic before we did preempt_disable(): * (used by the scheduler, *after* releasing the kernel lock) On a CONFIG_PREEMPT=n kernel the usage of in_atomic_preempt_off() works by accident, but with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y it's just broken. The whole purpose of the ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() is to reduce the latency on a CONFIG_PREEMPT=n kernel, so make ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() depend on CONFIG_PREEMPT=n and remove the in_atomic_preempt_off() check. Addresses https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16210 [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Francois Valenduc <francois.valenduc@tvcablenet.be> Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* correct console log level when ERST ACPI table is not foundDaniel J Blueman2010-07-021-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | When booting 2.6.35-rc3 on a x86 system without an ERST ACPI table with the 'quiet' option, we still observe an "ERST: Table is not found!" warning. Quiesce it to the same info log level as the other 'table not found' warnings. Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* ACPI, APEI, Error Record Serialization Table (ERST) supportHuang Ying2010-05-201-0/+855
ERST is a way provided by APEI to save and retrieve hardware error record to and from some simple persistent storage (such as flash). The Linux kernel support implementation is quite simple and workable in NMI context. So it can be used to save hardware error record into flash in hardware error exception or NMI handler, where other more complex persistent storage such as disk is not usable. After saving hardware error records via ERST in hardware error exception or NMI handler, the error records can be retrieved and logged into disk or network after a clean reboot. For more information about ERST, please refer to ACPI Specification version 4.0, section 17.4. This patch incorporate fixes from Jin Dongming. Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> CC: Jin Dongming <jin.dongming@np.css.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>