summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq coreViresh Kumar2013-10-311-21/+6Star
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines: struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; freqs.old = old freq... freqs.new = new freq... cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); /* Change rate here */ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead. There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for doing this work, work/tasklet/etc.. They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag: CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them. All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as double notification would happen otherwise. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routineViresh Kumar2013-10-251-11/+2Star
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation); And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they don't use target_freq and relation after that. So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers are converted to expose frequency tables. This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine. It looks like this: int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index); CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time. This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly. It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for many driver. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
* cpufreq: pxa: don't initialize part of policy set by coreViresh Kumar2013-10-161-2/+0Star
| | | | | | | | | | | | Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpufreq: pxa: Use generic cpufreq routinesViresh Kumar2013-10-161-25/+2Star
| | | | | | | | | | | | Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used by cpufreq drivers then. This patch uses these generic routines in the PXA driver. Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpufreq: pxa: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()Viresh Kumar2013-09-301-4/+2Star
| | | | | | | | | Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(). Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpufreq: pxa: call cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr()Viresh Kumar2013-09-301-1/+12
| | | | | | | | | | This exposes frequency table of driver to cpufreq core and is required for core to guess what the index for a target frequency is, when it calls cpufreq_frequency_table_target(). And so this driver needs to expose it. Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpufreq / pxa2xx: Fix pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages() __init attribute locationHanjun Guo2013-08-141-2/+2
| | | | | | | __init belongs after the return type on functions, not before it. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpufreq: rename index as driver_data in cpufreq_frequency_tableViresh Kumar2013-06-041-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The "index" field of struct cpufreq_frequency_table was never an index and isn't used at all by the cpufreq core. It only is useful for cpufreq drivers for their internal purposes. Many people nowadays blindly set it in ascending order with the assumption that the core will use it, which is a mistake. Rename it to "driver_data" as that's what its purpose is. All of its users are updated accordingly. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpufreq: pxa2xx: initialize variablesArnd Bergmann2013-04-251-2/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | gcc-3.8 correctly found that the variables set by find_freq_tables() are not initialized if this function is called on something other than a pxa2xx or pxa3xx: pxa2xx-cpufreq.c: In function 'pxa_verify_policy': pxa2xx-cpufreq.c:272:6: warning: 'pxa_freqs_table' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] pxa2xx-cpufreq.c: In function 'pxa_set_target': pxa2xx-cpufreq.c:345:23: warning: 'pxa_freq_settings' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] Rather than adding a bogus initialization that would let us get a little further before crashing, add an explicit BUG(). We know that this code is designed to run on only these cpus, so this will fix the build warning and give a more helpful diagnostic if the code ever changes to run on other machines. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpufreq: pxa2xx: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreqViresh Kumar2013-04-081-0/+491
This patch moves cpufreq driver of ARM based pxa2xx platform to drivers/cpufreq. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>