From c76a093dc1415d364020b8b33f1e194ef4d26fd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Masanari Iida Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 12:46:01 +0900 Subject: x86/Documentation: Fix various typos in Documentation/x86/ files Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: corbet@lwn.net Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160701034601.30308-1-standby24x7@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- Documentation/x86/tlb.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'Documentation/x86/tlb.txt') diff --git a/Documentation/x86/tlb.txt b/Documentation/x86/tlb.txt index 39d172326703..6a0607b99ed8 100644 --- a/Documentation/x86/tlb.txt +++ b/Documentation/x86/tlb.txt @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ memory, it has two choices: from areas other than the one we are trying to flush will be destroyed and must be refilled later, at some cost. 2. Use the invlpg instruction to invalidate a single page at a - time. This could potentialy cost many more instructions, but + time. This could potentially cost many more instructions, but it is a much more precise operation, causing no collateral damage to other TLB entries. @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Which method to do depends on a few things: work. 3. The size of the TLB. The larger the TLB, the more collateral damage we do with a full flush. So, the larger the TLB, the - more attrative an individual flush looks. Data and + more attractive an individual flush looks. Data and instructions have separate TLBs, as do different page sizes. 4. The microarchitecture. The TLB has become a multi-level cache on modern CPUs, and the global flushes have become more -- cgit v1.2.3-55-g7522