From db2a144bedd58b3dcf19950c2f476c58c9f39d18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 21:52:57 -0400 Subject: block_device_operations->release() should return void The value passed is 0 in all but "it can never happen" cases (and those only in a couple of drivers) *and* it would've been lost on the way out anyway, even if something tried to pass something meaningful. Just don't bother. Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c') diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c index a894f88762d8..d89ef86220f4 100644 --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c @@ -1617,7 +1617,7 @@ out: return err; } -static int blkif_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode) +static void blkif_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode) { struct blkfront_info *info = disk->private_data; struct block_device *bdev; @@ -1658,7 +1658,6 @@ static int blkif_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode) out: bdput(bdev); mutex_unlock(&blkfront_mutex); - return 0; } static const struct block_device_operations xlvbd_block_fops = -- cgit v1.2.3-55-g7522