From 49246466a98996e78b68a0041807dbd2628c53fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amir Goldstein Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 17:34:10 +0300 Subject: fsnotify: move fsnotify_nameremove() hook out of d_delete() d_delete() was piggy backed for the fsnotify_nameremove() hook when in fact not all callers of d_delete() care about fsnotify events. For all callers of d_delete() that may be interested in fsnotify events, we made sure to call one of fsnotify_{unlink,rmdir}() hooks before calling d_delete(). Now we can move the fsnotify_nameremove() call from d_delete() to the fsnotify_{unlink,rmdir}() hooks. Two explicit calls to fsnotify_nameremove() from nfs/afs sillyrename are also removed. This will cause a change of behavior - nfs/afs will NOT generate an fsnotify delete event when renaming over a positive dentry. This change is desirable, because it is consistent with the behavior of all other filesystems. Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Signed-off-by: Jan Kara --- fs/afs/dir_silly.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/afs') diff --git a/fs/afs/dir_silly.c b/fs/afs/dir_silly.c index 057b8d322422..361088a5edb9 100644 --- a/fs/afs/dir_silly.c +++ b/fs/afs/dir_silly.c @@ -60,11 +60,6 @@ static int afs_do_silly_rename(struct afs_vnode *dvnode, struct afs_vnode *vnode if (test_bit(AFS_VNODE_DIR_VALID, &dvnode->flags)) afs_edit_dir_add(dvnode, &new->d_name, &vnode->fid, afs_edit_dir_for_silly_1); - - /* vfs_unlink and the like do not issue this when a file is - * sillyrenamed, so do it here. - */ - fsnotify_nameremove(old, 0); } kfree(scb); -- cgit v1.2.3-55-g7522