From 5955102c9984fa081b2d570cfac75c97eecf8f3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:40:57 -0500 Subject: wrappers for ->i_mutex access parallel to mutex_{lock,unlock,trylock,is_locked,lock_nested}, inode_foo(inode) being mutex_foo(&inode->i_mutex). Please, use those for access to ->i_mutex; over the coming cycle ->i_mutex will become rwsem, with ->lookup() done with it held only shared. Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/exec.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/exec.c') diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c index 828ec5f07de0..dcd4ac7d3f1e 100644 --- a/fs/exec.c +++ b/fs/exec.c @@ -1307,13 +1307,13 @@ static void bprm_fill_uid(struct linux_binprm *bprm) return; /* Be careful if suid/sgid is set */ - mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex); + inode_lock(inode); /* reload atomically mode/uid/gid now that lock held */ mode = inode->i_mode; uid = inode->i_uid; gid = inode->i_gid; - mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex); + inode_unlock(inode); /* We ignore suid/sgid if there are no mappings for them in the ns */ if (!kuid_has_mapping(bprm->cred->user_ns, uid) || -- cgit v1.2.3-55-g7522