From 7d4ea3ce63a6bc532abb334c469c18481798af8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Chinner Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:12:53 +1000 Subject: xfs: use ranged writeback and invalidation for direct IO Now we are not doing silly things with dirtying buffers beyond EOF and using invalidation correctly, we can finally reduce the ranges of writeback and invalidation used by direct IO to match that of the IO being issued. Bring the writeback and invalidation ranges back to match the generic direct IO code - this will greatly reduce the perturbation of cached data when direct IO and buffered IO are mixed, but still provide the same buffered vs direct IO coherency behaviour we currently have. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Reviewed-by: Brian Foster Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner --- fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/xfs') diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c index 19917faac2d2..de5368c803f9 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ xfs_file_read_iter( if (inode->i_mapping->nrpages) { ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range( VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping, - pos, -1); + pos, pos + size - 1); if (ret) { xfs_rw_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL); return ret; @@ -303,7 +303,8 @@ xfs_file_read_iter( * happen on XFS. Warn if it does fail. */ ret = invalidate_inode_pages2_range(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping, - pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT, -1); + pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT, + (pos + size - 1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT); WARN_ON_ONCE(ret); ret = 0; } @@ -641,7 +642,7 @@ xfs_file_dio_aio_write( if (mapping->nrpages) { ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping, - pos, -1); + pos, pos + count - 1); if (ret) goto out; /* @@ -650,7 +651,8 @@ xfs_file_dio_aio_write( * happen on XFS. Warn if it does fail. */ ret = invalidate_inode_pages2_range(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping, - pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT, -1); + pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT, + (pos + count - 1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT); WARN_ON_ONCE(ret); ret = 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3-55-g7522