From f24444b01bf6c51c300fd3ffc73423383d747882 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:02:58 +0200 Subject: hrtimers: Make struct hrtimer_cpu_base layout less stupid In the HIGHRES=y case we access the members at the end of struct hrtimer_cpu_base first and then the one at the beginning. Move the hrtimer data to front, so we have linear progressing access. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Peter Zijlstra --- include/linux/hrtimer.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/linux/hrtimer.h') diff --git a/include/linux/hrtimer.h b/include/linux/hrtimer.h index 925c8c01db7b..cc5f5f51db10 100644 --- a/include/linux/hrtimer.h +++ b/include/linux/hrtimer.h @@ -174,7 +174,6 @@ enum hrtimer_base_type { */ struct hrtimer_cpu_base { raw_spinlock_t lock; - struct hrtimer_clock_base clock_base[HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES]; #ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS ktime_t expires_next; int hres_active; @@ -184,6 +183,7 @@ struct hrtimer_cpu_base { unsigned long nr_hangs; ktime_t max_hang_time; #endif + struct hrtimer_clock_base clock_base[HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES]; }; static inline void hrtimer_set_expires(struct hrtimer *timer, ktime_t time) -- cgit v1.2.3-55-g7522