From 17cf22c33e1f1b5e435469c84e43872579497653 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric W. Biederman Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:51:53 -0800 Subject: pidns: Use task_active_pid_ns where appropriate The expressions tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns and task_active_pid_ns aka ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) should have the same number of cache line misses with the practical difference that ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) is released later in a processes life. Furthermore by using task_active_pid_ns it becomes trivial to write an unshare implementation for the the pid namespace. So I have used task_active_pid_ns everywhere I can. In fork since the pid has not yet been attached to the process I use ns_of_pid, to achieve the same effect. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman --- kernel/fork.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/fork.c') diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c index 8b20ab7d3aa2..7798c247f4b9 100644 --- a/kernel/fork.c +++ b/kernel/fork.c @@ -1442,7 +1442,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags, if (thread_group_leader(p)) { if (is_child_reaper(pid)) - p->nsproxy->pid_ns->child_reaper = p; + ns_of_pid(pid)->child_reaper = p; p->signal->leader_pid = pid; p->signal->tty = tty_kref_get(current->signal->tty); -- cgit v1.2.3-55-g7522