From c0da313e090d6e7130d0c3005245176296c24e4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul E. McKenney Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 09:58:47 -0700 Subject: rcu: Add extended-quiescent-state testing advice If you add or remove calls to rcu_idle_enter(), rcu_user_enter(), rcu_irq_exit(), rcu_irq_exit_irqson(), rcu_idle_exit(), rcu_user_exit(), rcu_irq_enter(), rcu_irq_enter_irqson(), rcu_nmi_enter(), or rcu_nmi_exit(), you should run a full set of tests on a kernel built with CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- kernel/rcu/tree.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index b0ad62b0e7b8..d234356d7afc 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -837,6 +837,9 @@ static void rcu_eqs_enter(bool user) * We crowbar the ->dynticks_nesting field to zero to allow for * the possibility of usermode upcalls having messed up our count * of interrupt nesting level during the prior busy period. + * + * If you add or remove a call to rcu_idle_enter(), be sure to test with + * CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y. */ void rcu_idle_enter(void) { @@ -852,6 +855,9 @@ void rcu_idle_enter(void) * is permitted between this call and rcu_user_exit(). This way the * CPU doesn't need to maintain the tick for RCU maintenance purposes * when the CPU runs in userspace. + * + * If you add or remove a call to rcu_user_enter(), be sure to test with + * CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y. */ void rcu_user_enter(void) { @@ -875,6 +881,9 @@ void rcu_user_enter(void) * Use things like work queues to work around this limitation. * * You have been warned. + * + * If you add or remove a call to rcu_irq_exit(), be sure to test with + * CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y. */ void rcu_irq_exit(void) { @@ -899,6 +908,9 @@ void rcu_irq_exit(void) /* * Wrapper for rcu_irq_exit() where interrupts are enabled. + * + * If you add or remove a call to rcu_irq_exit_irqson(), be sure to test + * with CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y. */ void rcu_irq_exit_irqson(void) { @@ -971,6 +983,9 @@ static void rcu_eqs_exit(bool user) * allow for the possibility of usermode upcalls messing up our count * of interrupt nesting level during the busy period that is just * now starting. + * + * If you add or remove a call to rcu_idle_exit(), be sure to test with + * CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y. */ void rcu_idle_exit(void) { @@ -987,6 +1002,9 @@ void rcu_idle_exit(void) * * Exit RCU idle mode while entering the kernel because it can * run a RCU read side critical section anytime. + * + * If you add or remove a call to rcu_user_exit(), be sure to test with + * CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y. */ void rcu_user_exit(void) { @@ -1012,6 +1030,9 @@ void rcu_user_exit(void) * Use things like work queues to work around this limitation. * * You have been warned. + * + * If you add or remove a call to rcu_irq_enter(), be sure to test with + * CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y. */ void rcu_irq_enter(void) { @@ -1037,6 +1058,9 @@ void rcu_irq_enter(void) /* * Wrapper for rcu_irq_enter() where interrupts are enabled. + * + * If you add or remove a call to rcu_irq_enter_irqson(), be sure to test + * with CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y. */ void rcu_irq_enter_irqson(void) { @@ -1055,6 +1079,9 @@ void rcu_irq_enter_irqson(void) * that the CPU is active. This implementation permits nested NMIs, as * long as the nesting level does not overflow an int. (You will probably * run out of stack space first.) + * + * If you add or remove a call to rcu_nmi_enter(), be sure to test + * with CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y. */ void rcu_nmi_enter(void) { @@ -1087,6 +1114,9 @@ void rcu_nmi_enter(void) * RCU-idle period, update rdtp->dynticks and rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting * to let the RCU grace-period handling know that the CPU is back to * being RCU-idle. + * + * If you add or remove a call to rcu_nmi_exit(), be sure to test + * with CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y. */ void rcu_nmi_exit(void) { -- cgit v1.2.3-55-g7522