From 87029ee9390b2297dae699d5fb135b77992116e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Grygorii Strashko
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:50:14 -0800
Subject: mm/memblock: reorder parameters of memblock_find_in_range_node

Reorder parameters of memblock_find_in_range_node to be consistent with
other memblock APIs.

The change was suggested by Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>.

Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 mm/memblock.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

(limited to 'mm/memblock.c')

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 6aca54812db0..a95d6dc066d5 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -157,10 +157,10 @@ __memblock_find_range_top_down(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
 
 /**
  * memblock_find_in_range_node - find free area in given range and node
- * @start: start of candidate range
- * @end: end of candidate range, can be %MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_{ANYWHERE|ACCESSIBLE}
  * @size: size of free area to find
  * @align: alignment of free area to find
+ * @start: start of candidate range
+ * @end: end of candidate range, can be %MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_{ANYWHERE|ACCESSIBLE}
  * @nid: nid of the free area to find, %MAX_NUMNODES for any node
  *
  * Find @size free area aligned to @align in the specified range and node.
@@ -176,9 +176,9 @@ __memblock_find_range_top_down(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
  * RETURNS:
  * Found address on success, 0 on failure.
  */
-phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start,
-					phys_addr_t end, phys_addr_t size,
-					phys_addr_t align, int nid)
+phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t size,
+					phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t start,
+					phys_addr_t end, int nid)
 {
 	int ret;
 	phys_addr_t kernel_end;
@@ -241,8 +241,8 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range(phys_addr_t start,
 					phys_addr_t end, phys_addr_t size,
 					phys_addr_t align)
 {
-	return memblock_find_in_range_node(start, end, size, align,
-					   MAX_NUMNODES);
+	return memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, start, end,
+					    MAX_NUMNODES);
 }
 
 static void __init_memblock memblock_remove_region(struct memblock_type *type, unsigned long r)
@@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_base_nid(phys_addr_t size,
 	/* align @size to avoid excessive fragmentation on reserved array */
 	size = round_up(size, align);
 
-	found = memblock_find_in_range_node(0, max_addr, size, align, nid);
+	found = memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, 0, max_addr, nid);
 	if (found && !memblock_reserve(found, size))
 		return found;
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-55-g7522