From 776ed0f0377914d1e65fed903c052e9eef3f4cc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vladimir Davydov Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:10:02 -0700 Subject: memcg: cleanup kmem cache creation/destruction functions naming Current names are rather inconsistent. Let's try to improve them. Brief change log: ** old name ** ** new name ** kmem_cache_create_memcg memcg_create_kmem_cache memcg_kmem_create_cache memcg_regsiter_cache memcg_kmem_destroy_cache memcg_unregister_cache kmem_cache_destroy_memcg_children memcg_cleanup_cache_params mem_cgroup_destroy_all_caches memcg_unregister_all_caches create_work memcg_register_cache_work memcg_create_cache_work_func memcg_register_cache_func memcg_create_cache_enqueue memcg_schedule_register_cache Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Johannes Weiner Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/memcontrol.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) (limited to 'mm/memcontrol.c') diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 5e2bfcc96da9..d176edb1d5e8 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -3132,8 +3132,8 @@ void memcg_free_cache_params(struct kmem_cache *s) kfree(s->memcg_params); } -static void memcg_kmem_create_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, - struct kmem_cache *root_cache) +static void memcg_register_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, + struct kmem_cache *root_cache) { static char memcg_name_buf[NAME_MAX + 1]; /* protected by memcg_slab_mutex */ @@ -3153,7 +3153,7 @@ static void memcg_kmem_create_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, return; cgroup_name(memcg->css.cgroup, memcg_name_buf, NAME_MAX + 1); - cachep = kmem_cache_create_memcg(memcg, root_cache, memcg_name_buf); + cachep = memcg_create_kmem_cache(memcg, root_cache, memcg_name_buf); /* * If we could not create a memcg cache, do not complain, because * that's not critical at all as we can always proceed with the root @@ -3175,7 +3175,7 @@ static void memcg_kmem_create_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, root_cache->memcg_params->memcg_caches[id] = cachep; } -static void memcg_kmem_destroy_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep) +static void memcg_unregister_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep) { struct kmem_cache *root_cache; struct mem_cgroup *memcg; @@ -3228,7 +3228,7 @@ static inline void memcg_resume_kmem_account(void) current->memcg_kmem_skip_account--; } -int __kmem_cache_destroy_memcg_children(struct kmem_cache *s) +int __memcg_cleanup_cache_params(struct kmem_cache *s) { struct kmem_cache *c; int i, failed = 0; @@ -3239,7 +3239,7 @@ int __kmem_cache_destroy_memcg_children(struct kmem_cache *s) if (!c) continue; - memcg_kmem_destroy_cache(c); + memcg_unregister_cache(c); if (cache_from_memcg_idx(s, i)) failed++; @@ -3248,7 +3248,7 @@ int __kmem_cache_destroy_memcg_children(struct kmem_cache *s) return failed; } -static void mem_cgroup_destroy_all_caches(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +static void memcg_unregister_all_caches(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { struct kmem_cache *cachep; struct memcg_cache_params *params, *tmp; @@ -3261,25 +3261,26 @@ static void mem_cgroup_destroy_all_caches(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) cachep = memcg_params_to_cache(params); kmem_cache_shrink(cachep); if (atomic_read(&cachep->memcg_params->nr_pages) == 0) - memcg_kmem_destroy_cache(cachep); + memcg_unregister_cache(cachep); } mutex_unlock(&memcg_slab_mutex); } -struct create_work { +struct memcg_register_cache_work { struct mem_cgroup *memcg; struct kmem_cache *cachep; struct work_struct work; }; -static void memcg_create_cache_work_func(struct work_struct *w) +static void memcg_register_cache_func(struct work_struct *w) { - struct create_work *cw = container_of(w, struct create_work, work); + struct memcg_register_cache_work *cw = + container_of(w, struct memcg_register_cache_work, work); struct mem_cgroup *memcg = cw->memcg; struct kmem_cache *cachep = cw->cachep; mutex_lock(&memcg_slab_mutex); - memcg_kmem_create_cache(memcg, cachep); + memcg_register_cache(memcg, cachep); mutex_unlock(&memcg_slab_mutex); css_put(&memcg->css); @@ -3289,12 +3290,12 @@ static void memcg_create_cache_work_func(struct work_struct *w) /* * Enqueue the creation of a per-memcg kmem_cache. */ -static void __memcg_create_cache_enqueue(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, - struct kmem_cache *cachep) +static void __memcg_schedule_register_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, + struct kmem_cache *cachep) { - struct create_work *cw; + struct memcg_register_cache_work *cw; - cw = kmalloc(sizeof(struct create_work), GFP_NOWAIT); + cw = kmalloc(sizeof(*cw), GFP_NOWAIT); if (cw == NULL) { css_put(&memcg->css); return; @@ -3303,17 +3304,17 @@ static void __memcg_create_cache_enqueue(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, cw->memcg = memcg; cw->cachep = cachep; - INIT_WORK(&cw->work, memcg_create_cache_work_func); + INIT_WORK(&cw->work, memcg_register_cache_func); schedule_work(&cw->work); } -static void memcg_create_cache_enqueue(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, - struct kmem_cache *cachep) +static void memcg_schedule_register_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, + struct kmem_cache *cachep) { /* * We need to stop accounting when we kmalloc, because if the * corresponding kmalloc cache is not yet created, the first allocation - * in __memcg_create_cache_enqueue will recurse. + * in __memcg_schedule_register_cache will recurse. * * However, it is better to enclose the whole function. Depending on * the debugging options enabled, INIT_WORK(), for instance, can @@ -3322,7 +3323,7 @@ static void memcg_create_cache_enqueue(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, * the safest choice is to do it like this, wrapping the whole function. */ memcg_stop_kmem_account(); - __memcg_create_cache_enqueue(memcg, cachep); + __memcg_schedule_register_cache(memcg, cachep); memcg_resume_kmem_account(); } @@ -3393,16 +3394,11 @@ struct kmem_cache *__memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, * * However, there are some clashes that can arrive from locking. * For instance, because we acquire the slab_mutex while doing - * kmem_cache_dup, this means no further allocation could happen - * with the slab_mutex held. - * - * Also, because cache creation issue get_online_cpus(), this - * creates a lock chain: memcg_slab_mutex -> cpu_hotplug_mutex, - * that ends up reversed during cpu hotplug. (cpuset allocates - * a bunch of GFP_KERNEL memory during cpuup). Due to all that, - * better to defer everything. + * memcg_create_kmem_cache, this means no further allocation + * could happen with the slab_mutex held. So it's better to + * defer everything. */ - memcg_create_cache_enqueue(memcg, cachep); + memcg_schedule_register_cache(memcg, cachep); return cachep; out: rcu_read_unlock(); @@ -3526,7 +3522,7 @@ void __memcg_kmem_uncharge_pages(struct page *page, int order) memcg_uncharge_kmem(memcg, PAGE_SIZE << order); } #else -static inline void mem_cgroup_destroy_all_caches(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +static inline void memcg_unregister_all_caches(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { } #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM */ @@ -6372,7 +6368,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_offline(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css) css_for_each_descendant_post(iter, css) mem_cgroup_reparent_charges(mem_cgroup_from_css(iter)); - mem_cgroup_destroy_all_caches(memcg); + memcg_unregister_all_caches(memcg); vmpressure_cleanup(&memcg->vmpressure); } -- cgit v1.2.3-55-g7522