From 6677e3eaf4d78abd7b09133414c05dc3ec353e7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:32:52 -0800 Subject: memory-hotplug: check whether all memory blocks are offlined or not when removing memory We remove the memory like this: 1. lock memory hotplug 2. offline a memory block 3. unlock memory hotplug 4. repeat 1-3 to offline all memory blocks 5. lock memory hotplug 6. remove memory(TODO) 7. unlock memory hotplug All memory blocks must be offlined before removing memory. But we don't hold the lock in the whole operation. So we should check whether all memory blocks are offlined before step6. Otherwise, kernel maybe panicked. Offlining a memory block and removing a memory device can be two different operations. Users can just offline some memory blocks without removing the memory device. For this purpose, the kernel has held lock_memory_hotplug() in __offline_pages(). To reuse the code for memory hot-remove, we repeat step 1-3 to offline all the memory blocks, repeatedly lock and unlock memory hotplug, but not hold the memory hotplug lock in the whole operation. Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu Signed-off-by: Tang Chen Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: Jiang Liu Cc: Jianguo Wu Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki Cc: Lai Jiangshan Cc: Wu Jianguo Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/memory_hotplug.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) (limited to 'mm/memory_hotplug.c') diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c index 6a82972aeae5..5d350f5c68e5 100644 --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c @@ -1429,6 +1429,54 @@ repeat: goto repeat; } + lock_memory_hotplug(); + + /* + * we have offlined all memory blocks like this: + * 1. lock memory hotplug + * 2. offline a memory block + * 3. unlock memory hotplug + * + * repeat step1-3 to offline the memory block. All memory blocks + * must be offlined before removing memory. But we don't hold the + * lock in the whole operation. So we should check whether all + * memory blocks are offlined. + */ + + mem = NULL; + for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) { + section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn); + if (!present_section_nr(section_nr)) + continue; + + section = __nr_to_section(section_nr); + /* same memblock? */ + if (mem) + if ((section_nr >= mem->start_section_nr) && + (section_nr <= mem->end_section_nr)) + continue; + + mem = find_memory_block_hinted(section, mem); + if (!mem) + continue; + + ret = is_memblock_offlined(mem); + if (!ret) { + pr_warn("removing memory fails, because memory " + "[%#010llx-%#010llx] is onlined\n", + PFN_PHYS(section_nr_to_pfn(mem->start_section_nr)), + PFN_PHYS(section_nr_to_pfn(mem->end_section_nr + 1)) - 1); + + kobject_put(&mem->dev.kobj); + unlock_memory_hotplug(); + return ret; + } + } + + if (mem) + kobject_put(&mem->dev.kobj); + unlock_memory_hotplug(); + return 0; } #else -- cgit v1.2.3-55-g7522