From 32fc71875127498bf99cc648e96400ee0895edf7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:16:04 +0100 Subject: netfilter: nf_tables: return EBUSY if device already belongs to flowtable If the netdevice is already part of a flowtable, return EBUSY. I cannot find a valid usecase for having two flowtables bound to the same netdevice. We can still have two flowtable where the device set is disjoint. Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso --- net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c') diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c index 8b9fe30de0cd..43acdeef045d 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c @@ -5037,9 +5037,9 @@ static int nf_tables_newflowtable(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk, { const struct nfgenmsg *nfmsg = nlmsg_data(nlh); const struct nf_flowtable_type *type; + struct nft_flowtable *flowtable, *ft; u8 genmask = nft_genmask_next(net); int family = nfmsg->nfgen_family; - struct nft_flowtable *flowtable; struct nft_table *table; struct nft_ctx ctx; int err, i, k; @@ -5099,6 +5099,22 @@ static int nf_tables_newflowtable(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk, goto err3; for (i = 0; i < flowtable->ops_len; i++) { + if (!flowtable->ops[i].dev) + continue; + + list_for_each_entry(ft, &table->flowtables, list) { + for (k = 0; k < ft->ops_len; k++) { + if (!ft->ops[k].dev) + continue; + + if (flowtable->ops[i].dev == ft->ops[k].dev && + flowtable->ops[i].pf == ft->ops[k].pf) { + err = -EBUSY; + goto err4; + } + } + } + err = nf_register_net_hook(net, &flowtable->ops[i]); if (err < 0) goto err4; -- cgit v1.2.3-55-g7522