| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We want to remove it in 2 years, March 2017.
See discussion "tailf, really needed?"
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.util-linux-ng/10967
[kzak@redhat.com: - move warning to usage()]
Signed-off-by: Ruediger Meier <ruediger.meier@ga-group.nl>
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also trim some trailing whitespace.
Reviewed-by: Peter Cordes <peter@cordes.ca>
Signed-off-by: Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@justemail.net>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reference: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.util-linux-ng/10431
Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The sfdisk does not care about compatibility with classic DOS
partitioning, and it does not warn about incompatibility with DOS at
all. It means that --Linux is default and it's unnecessary to use
this option.
It's the same situation like with "--unit S", these options are very
probably often used in scripts, and these all is default now. So for
backward compatibility new sfdisk accepts these options on command
line, but prints "option is deprecated" warning message.
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@justemail.net>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sometimes we use "behaviour" and "behavior" in the same text, let's
use "behavior" only everywhere.
Addresses: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011068
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@justemail.net>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Oprala <ooprala@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Having howtos is good, having an working code that can be used as-is to
kickstart a write of a new command is better.
Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Theodore Ts'o:
I'll add that I've never been convinced that the mkfs front end is all
that useful. It's probably better for people to explicitly run
/sbin/mkfs.xfs, /sbin/mkfs.ext4, etc.., so you don't have to worry
about which options get passed down to the file system specific mkfs
program, and which ones are interpreted by /sbin/mkfs --- and I don't
believe /sbin/mkfs adds enough (err, any?) value that using
"/sbin/mkfs -t xxx" vs "/sbin/mkfs.xxx" makes any sense whatsoever.
... and I absolutely agree.
Reported-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note that rather than implement wipe command in fdisk it's better
inform users to call wipefs(8).
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|