openslx/kernel-qcow2-util-linux.git - In-kernel qcow2 (losetup)

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	rename util-linux-ng back to util-linux	Karel Zak	2010-11-30	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
*	textual: slightly improve two README files	Benno Schulenberg	2010-06-30	1	-3/+3
\| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@justemail.net>
*	docs: add LGPLv2+ to list of licenses	Karel Zak	2009-12-14	1	-0/+2
\| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
*	lscpu: new command	Cai Qian	2008-07-18	1	-0/+2
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Add a lscpu(1) utility program. [kzak@redhat.com: - indent by linux-2.6/scripts/Lindent - add lscpu.{c,1} to sys-utils/Makefile.am - add NLS suport - complete code refactoring ] Co-Author: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Cai Qian <qcai@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
*	docs: fix BSD licence name in README.licensing	Karel Zak	2007-08-17	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
*	docs: add README.licensing	Karel Zak	2007-08-14	1	-0/+18
	There is not only one unique license for all code in utl-linux-ng. We have mix of utils with Public Domain, BSD, GPLv2 or GPLv2+. This thing should be more transparent to avoid misunderstanding. Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>