| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
In addition, do it in a single sentence instead of in two fragments.
Signed-off-by: Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@justemail.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Let's use nanosleep() although if usleep() exists. The nanosleep
function does no interact with signals and other timers.
The patch introduces xusleep() as replacement to libc (or our fallback)
usleep(). Yes, we don't want to use struct timespec + nanosleep()
everywhere in code as nano-time resolution is useless for us.
The patch also enlarges delays in some busy wait loops. It seems
enough to try read/write 4x per second.
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
To make it available everywhere in code.
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
|
