summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Maydell2022-01-14 16:50:32 +0100
committerLaurent Vivier2022-03-08 16:01:08 +0100
commit4ff17cf0aa8854941dc0538c74d4f1677a570575 (patch)
treee0d595eb4c6e461352729d56620cb8f82ad730c0
parentMerge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/cschoenebeck/tags/pull-9p-20220307' int... (diff)
downloadqemu-4ff17cf0aa8854941dc0538c74d4f1677a570575.tar.gz
qemu-4ff17cf0aa8854941dc0538c74d4f1677a570575.tar.xz
qemu-4ff17cf0aa8854941dc0538c74d4f1677a570575.zip
linux-user: Remove stale "not threadsafe" comments
In linux-user/signal.c we have two FIXME comments claiming that parts of the signal-handling code are not threadsafe. These are very old, as they were first introduced in commit 624f7979058 in 2008. Since then we've radically overhauled the signal-handling logic, while carefully preserving these FIXME comments. It's unclear exactly what thread-safety issue the original author was trying to point out -- the relevant data structures are in the TaskStruct, which makes them per-thread and only operated on by that thread. The old code at the time of that commit did have various races involving signal handlers being invoked at awkward times; possibly this was what was meant. Delete these FIXME comments: * they were written at a time when the way we handled signals was completely different * the code today appears to us to not have thread-safety issues * nobody knows what the problem the comments were trying to point out was so they are serving no useful purpose for us today. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Message-Id: <20220114155032.3767771-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
-rw-r--r--linux-user/signal.c2
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/linux-user/signal.c b/linux-user/signal.c
index 27a0ff30e9..2a3f3cc23f 100644
--- a/linux-user/signal.c
+++ b/linux-user/signal.c
@@ -999,7 +999,6 @@ int do_sigaction(int sig, const struct target_sigaction *act,
oact->sa_mask = k->sa_mask;
}
if (act) {
- /* FIXME: This is not threadsafe. */
__get_user(k->_sa_handler, &act->_sa_handler);
__get_user(k->sa_flags, &act->sa_flags);
#ifdef TARGET_ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER
@@ -1149,7 +1148,6 @@ void process_pending_signals(CPUArchState *cpu_env)
sigset_t *blocked_set;
while (qatomic_read(&ts->signal_pending)) {
- /* FIXME: This is not threadsafe. */
sigfillset(&set);
sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &set, 0);