diff options
author | Eric Blake | 2022-05-12 02:49:24 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kevin Wolf | 2022-05-12 13:10:52 +0200 |
commit | 58a6fdcc9efb2a7c1ef4893dca4aa5e8020ca3dc (patch) | |
tree | 2dba1567609a2df70bbb9e01e2fb89b18b2238ee /nbd | |
parent | qemu-nbd: Pass max connections to blockdev layer (diff) | |
download | qemu-58a6fdcc9efb2a7c1ef4893dca4aa5e8020ca3dc.tar.gz qemu-58a6fdcc9efb2a7c1ef4893dca4aa5e8020ca3dc.tar.xz qemu-58a6fdcc9efb2a7c1ef4893dca4aa5e8020ca3dc.zip |
nbd/server: Allow MULTI_CONN for shared writable exports
According to the NBD spec, a server that advertises
NBD_FLAG_CAN_MULTI_CONN promises that multiple client connections will
not see any cache inconsistencies: when properly separated by a single
flush, actions performed by one client will be visible to another
client, regardless of which client did the flush.
We always satisfy these conditions in qemu - even when we support
multiple clients, ALL clients go through a single point of reference
into the block layer, with no local caching. The effect of one client
is instantly visible to the next client. Even if our backend were a
network device, we argue that any multi-path caching effects that
would cause inconsistencies in back-to-back actions not seeing the
effect of previous actions would be a bug in that backend, and not the
fault of caching in qemu. As such, it is safe to unconditionally
advertise CAN_MULTI_CONN for any qemu NBD server situation that
supports parallel clients.
Note, however, that we don't want to advertise CAN_MULTI_CONN when we
know that a second client cannot connect (for historical reasons,
qemu-nbd defaults to a single connection while nbd-server-add and QMP
commands default to unlimited connections; but we already have
existing means to let either style of NBD server creation alter those
defaults). This is visible by no longer advertising MULTI_CONN for
'qemu-nbd -r' without -e, as in the iotest nbd-qemu-allocation.
The harder part of this patch is setting up an iotest to demonstrate
behavior of multiple NBD clients to a single server. It might be
possible with parallel qemu-io processes, but I found it easier to do
in python with the help of libnbd, and help from Nir and Vladimir in
writing the test.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <v.sementsov-og@mail.ru>
Message-Id: <20220512004924.417153-3-eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'nbd')
-rw-r--r-- | nbd/server.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/nbd/server.c b/nbd/server.c index 4cdbc062c1..213e00e761 100644 --- a/nbd/server.c +++ b/nbd/server.c @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* - * Copyright (C) 2016-2021 Red Hat, Inc. + * Copyright (C) 2016-2022 Red Hat, Inc. * Copyright (C) 2005 Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> * * Network Block Device Server Side @@ -1642,7 +1642,6 @@ static int nbd_export_create(BlockExport *blk_exp, BlockExportOptions *exp_args, int64_t size; uint64_t perm, shared_perm; bool readonly = !exp_args->writable; - bool shared = !exp_args->writable; BlockDirtyBitmapOrStrList *bitmaps; size_t i; int ret; @@ -1693,11 +1692,12 @@ static int nbd_export_create(BlockExport *blk_exp, BlockExportOptions *exp_args, exp->description = g_strdup(arg->description); exp->nbdflags = (NBD_FLAG_HAS_FLAGS | NBD_FLAG_SEND_FLUSH | NBD_FLAG_SEND_FUA | NBD_FLAG_SEND_CACHE); + + if (nbd_server_max_connections() != 1) { + exp->nbdflags |= NBD_FLAG_CAN_MULTI_CONN; + } if (readonly) { exp->nbdflags |= NBD_FLAG_READ_ONLY; - if (shared) { - exp->nbdflags |= NBD_FLAG_CAN_MULTI_CONN; - } } else { exp->nbdflags |= (NBD_FLAG_SEND_TRIM | NBD_FLAG_SEND_WRITE_ZEROES | NBD_FLAG_SEND_FAST_ZERO); |