diff options
author | David Hildenbrand | 2020-11-16 11:59:47 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paolo Bonzini | 2020-11-16 19:22:17 +0100 |
commit | b430b51395650137a80e78ee7395165b80fe1752 (patch) | |
tree | 4857d2981dcaf46f1685610f075eb3e06603d5d8 /stubs | |
parent | kvm/i386: Set proper nested state format for SVM (diff) | |
download | qemu-b430b51395650137a80e78ee7395165b80fe1752.tar.gz qemu-b430b51395650137a80e78ee7395165b80fe1752.tar.xz qemu-b430b51395650137a80e78ee7395165b80fe1752.zip |
util/vfio-helpers.c: Use ram_block_discard_disable() in qemu_vfio_open_pci()
Currently, when using "nvme://" for a block device, like
-drive file=nvme://0000:01:00.0/1,if=none,id=drive0 \
-device virtio-blk,drive=drive0 \
VFIO may pin all guest memory, and discarding of RAM no longer works as
expected. I was able to reproduce this easily with my
01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981/PM983
Similar to common VFIO, we have to disable it, making sure that:
a) virtio-balloon won't discard any memory ("silently disabled")
b) virtio-mem and nvme:// run mutually exclusive
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201116105947.9194-1-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'stubs')
-rw-r--r-- | stubs/ram-block.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/stubs/ram-block.c b/stubs/ram-block.c index 73c0a3ee08..108197683b 100644 --- a/stubs/ram-block.c +++ b/stubs/ram-block.c @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ #include "qemu/osdep.h" #include "exec/ramlist.h" #include "exec/cpu-common.h" +#include "exec/memory.h" void *qemu_ram_get_host_addr(RAMBlock *rb) { @@ -29,3 +30,8 @@ int qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void *opaque) { return 0; } + +int ram_block_discard_disable(bool state) +{ + return 0; +} |