diff options
author | Stefan Hajnoczi | 2017-08-22 14:51:13 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Eric Blake | 2017-08-23 18:22:15 +0200 |
commit | 40f4a21895b5a7eae4011593837069f63460d983 (patch) | |
tree | cacbb56b00763fc9e0956df21ca11d742a77aa14 /tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py | |
parent | qemu-iotests: add 194 non-shared storage migration test (diff) | |
download | qemu-40f4a21895b5a7eae4011593837069f63460d983.tar.gz qemu-40f4a21895b5a7eae4011593837069f63460d983.tar.xz qemu-40f4a21895b5a7eae4011593837069f63460d983.zip |
nbd-client: avoid spurious qio_channel_yield() re-entry
The following scenario leads to an assertion failure in
qio_channel_yield():
1. Request coroutine calls qio_channel_yield() successfully when sending
would block on the socket. It is now yielded.
2. nbd_read_reply_entry() calls nbd_recv_coroutines_enter_all() because
nbd_receive_reply() failed.
3. Request coroutine is entered and returns from qio_channel_yield().
Note that the socket fd handler has not fired yet so
ioc->write_coroutine is still set.
4. Request coroutine attempts to send the request body with nbd_rwv()
but the socket would still block. qio_channel_yield() is called
again and assert(!ioc->write_coroutine) is hit.
The problem is that nbd_read_reply_entry() does not distinguish between
request coroutines that are waiting to receive a reply and those that
are not.
This patch adds a per-request bool receiving flag so
nbd_read_reply_entry() can avoid spurious aio_wake() calls.
Reported-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170822125113.5025-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Tested-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions