blob: 228680ea109edeb42d5f8af7ce409fa2dbdfc07b (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
|
diff -ur samba-3.0.25a/source/configure.in samba-3.0.25a-patched/source/configure.in
--- samba-3.0.25a/source/configure.in 2007-06-19 11:40:49.000000000 -0500
+++ samba-3.0.25a-patched/source/configure.in 2007-06-19 11:45:04.000000000 -0500
@@ -511,37 +511,8 @@
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_VOLATILE, 1, [Whether the C compiler understands volatile])
fi
-############################################
-# check if the compiler can handle negative enum values
-# and don't truncate the values to INT_MAX
-# a runtime test is needed here
-AC_SUBST(PIDL_ARGS)
-AC_CACHE_CHECK([that the C compiler understands negative enum values],SMB_BUILD_CC_NEGATIVE_ENUM_VALUES, [
- AC_TRY_RUN(
-[
- #include <stdio.h>
- enum negative_values { NEGATIVE_VALUE = 0xFFFFFFFF };
- int main(void) {
- enum negative_values v1 = NEGATIVE_VALUE;
- unsigned v2 = NEGATIVE_VALUE;
-
- if (v1 != 0xFFFFFFFF) {
- printf("%u != 0xFFFFFFFF\n", v1);
- return 1;
- }
- if (v2 != 0xFFFFFFFF) {
- printf("%u != 0xFFFFFFFF\n", v2);
- return 1;
- }
-
- return 0;
- }
-],
- SMB_BUILD_CC_NEGATIVE_ENUM_VALUES=yes,SMB_BUILD_CC_NEGATIVE_ENUM_VALUES=no)])
-if test x"$SMB_BUILD_CC_NEGATIVE_ENUM_VALUES" != x"yes"; then
- AC_MSG_WARN([using --unit-enums for pidl])
- PIDL_ARGS="$PIDL_ARGS --uint-enums"
-fi
+# Just hard code this for cross compile cases
+PIDL_ARGS="$PIDL_ARGS --uint-enums"
dnl Figure out the flags to support named structure initializers
|
