summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWanpeng Li2019-07-22 06:26:21 +0200
committerPaolo Bonzini2019-07-22 13:55:48 +0200
commitd9a710e5fc4941944d565b013414e9fdc66242b5 (patch)
tree9f832b1d46c0addf58003df168a347e43707ed11 /arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
parentKVM: X86: Fix fpu state crash in kvm guest (diff)
downloadkernel-qcow2-linux-d9a710e5fc4941944d565b013414e9fdc66242b5.tar.gz
kernel-qcow2-linux-d9a710e5fc4941944d565b013414e9fdc66242b5.tar.xz
kernel-qcow2-linux-d9a710e5fc4941944d565b013414e9fdc66242b5.zip
KVM: X86: Dynamically allocate user_fpu
After reverting commit 240c35a3783a (kvm: x86: Use task structs fpu field for user), struct kvm_vcpu is 19456 bytes on my server, PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER(3) is the order at which allocations are deemed costly to service. In serveless scenario, one host can service hundreds/thoudands firecracker/kata-container instances, howerver, new instance will fail to launch after memory is too fragmented to allocate kvm_vcpu struct on host, this was observed in some cloud provider product environments. This patch dynamically allocates user_fpu, kvm_vcpu is 15168 bytes now on my Skylake server. Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kvm/svm.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/kvm/svm.c13
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 19f69df96758..7eafc6907861 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -2143,12 +2143,20 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *svm_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
goto out;
}
+ svm->vcpu.arch.user_fpu = kmem_cache_zalloc(x86_fpu_cache,
+ GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+ if (!svm->vcpu.arch.user_fpu) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "kvm: failed to allocate kvm userspace's fpu\n");
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto free_partial_svm;
+ }
+
svm->vcpu.arch.guest_fpu = kmem_cache_zalloc(x86_fpu_cache,
GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!svm->vcpu.arch.guest_fpu) {
printk(KERN_ERR "kvm: failed to allocate vcpu's fpu\n");
err = -ENOMEM;
- goto free_partial_svm;
+ goto free_user_fpu;
}
err = kvm_vcpu_init(&svm->vcpu, kvm, id);
@@ -2211,6 +2219,8 @@ uninit:
kvm_vcpu_uninit(&svm->vcpu);
free_svm:
kmem_cache_free(x86_fpu_cache, svm->vcpu.arch.guest_fpu);
+free_user_fpu:
+ kmem_cache_free(x86_fpu_cache, svm->vcpu.arch.user_fpu);
free_partial_svm:
kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, svm);
out:
@@ -2241,6 +2251,7 @@ static void svm_free_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
__free_page(virt_to_page(svm->nested.hsave));
__free_pages(virt_to_page(svm->nested.msrpm), MSRPM_ALLOC_ORDER);
kvm_vcpu_uninit(vcpu);
+ kmem_cache_free(x86_fpu_cache, svm->vcpu.arch.user_fpu);
kmem_cache_free(x86_fpu_cache, svm->vcpu.arch.guest_fpu);
kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, svm);
}