memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_find_in_range_node() with generic memblock calls

With the previous changes, generic NUMA aware memblock API has feature
parity with memblock_x86_find_in_range_node().  There currently are
two users - x86 setup_node_data() and __alloc_memory_core_early() in
nobootmem.c.

This patch converts the former to use memblock_alloc_nid() and the
latter memblock_find_range_in_node(), and kills
memblock_x86_find_in_range_node() and related functions including
find_memory_early_core_early() in page_alloc.c.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310460395-30913-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

3 files changed, 1 insertions, 24 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
index 0cd3800f33b9..161792ec524f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ int get_free_all_memory_range(struct range **rangep, int nodeid);
 void memblock_x86_register_active_regions(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
 					 unsigned long last_pfn);
 u64 memblock_x86_hole_size(u64 start, u64 end);
-u64 memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(int nid, u64 start, u64 end, u64 size, u64 align);
 u64 memblock_x86_free_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit);
 u64 memblock_x86_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit);
 bool memblock_x86_check_reserved_size(u64 *addrp, u64 *sizep, u64 align);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
index da0d5c84586e..e4569f85b390 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
@@ -252,21 +252,6 @@ void __init memblock_x86_free_range(u64 start, u64 end)
 }
 
 /*
- * Need to call this function after memblock_x86_register_active_regions,
- * so early_node_map[] is filled already.
- */
-u64 __init memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(int nid, u64 start, u64 end, u64 size, u64 align)
-{
-	u64 addr;
-	addr = find_memory_core_early(nid, size, align, start, end);
-	if (addr)
-		return addr;
-
-	/* Fallback, should already have start end within node range */
-	return memblock_find_in_range(start, end, size, align);
-}
-
-/*
  * Finds an active region in the address range from start_pfn to last_pfn and
  * returns its range in ei_startpfn and ei_endpfn for the memblock entry.
  */
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index fa1015de5cc0..824efadc5741 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -192,8 +192,6 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
 /* Initialize NODE_DATA for a node on the local memory */
 static void __init setup_node_data(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
 {
-	const u64 nd_low = PFN_PHYS(MAX_DMA_PFN);
-	const u64 nd_high = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn_mapped);
 	const size_t nd_size = roundup(sizeof(pg_data_t), PAGE_SIZE);
 	bool remapped = false;
 	u64 nd_pa;
@@ -224,17 +222,12 @@ static void __init setup_node_data(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
 		nd_pa = __pa(nd);
 		remapped = true;
 	} else {
-		nd_pa = memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(nid, nd_low, nd_high,
-						nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
-		if (!nd_pa)
-			nd_pa = memblock_find_in_range(nd_low, nd_high,
-						nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
+		nd_pa = memblock_alloc_nid(nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, nid);
 		if (!nd_pa) {
 			pr_err("Cannot find %zu bytes in node %d\n",
 			       nd_size, nid);
 			return;
 		}
-		memblock_x86_reserve_range(nd_pa, nd_pa + nd_size, "NODE_DATA");
 		nd = __va(nd_pa);
 	}