summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBen Widawsky2012-01-26 00:39:34 +0100
committerDaniel Vetter2012-01-26 11:19:19 +0100
commitb93f9cf14e714c20ce9a544ed1a6070ee7604588 (patch)
treebbf78a595254e96d88206bb60f400ae907a561f0 /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
parentdrm/i915: Correct the bit number for the MI_FLUSH_ENABLE. (diff)
downloadkernel-qcow2-linux-b93f9cf14e714c20ce9a544ed1a6070ee7604588.tar.gz
kernel-qcow2-linux-b93f9cf14e714c20ce9a544ed1a6070ee7604588.tar.xz
kernel-qcow2-linux-b93f9cf14e714c20ce9a544ed1a6070ee7604588.zip
drm/i915: argument to control retiring behavior
Sometimes it may be the case when we idle the gpu or wait on something we don't actually want to process the retiring list. This patch allows callers to choose the behavior. Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c28
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index eb98a7f55cfe..ff3066c4c76a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -1943,7 +1943,8 @@ i915_gem_retire_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
*/
int
i915_wait_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
- uint32_t seqno)
+ uint32_t seqno,
+ bool do_retire)
{
drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private;
u32 ier;
@@ -2027,7 +2028,7 @@ i915_wait_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
* buffer to have made it to the inactive list, and we would need
* a separate wait queue to handle that.
*/
- if (ret == 0)
+ if (ret == 0 && do_retire)
i915_gem_retire_requests_ring(ring);
return ret;
@@ -2051,7 +2052,8 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_rendering(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
* it.
*/
if (obj->active) {
- ret = i915_wait_request(obj->ring, obj->last_rendering_seqno);
+ ret = i915_wait_request(obj->ring, obj->last_rendering_seqno,
+ true);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
@@ -2172,7 +2174,7 @@ i915_gem_flush_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
return 0;
}
-static int i915_ring_idle(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
+static int i915_ring_idle(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, bool do_retire)
{
int ret;
@@ -2186,18 +2188,18 @@ static int i915_ring_idle(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
return ret;
}
- return i915_wait_request(ring, i915_gem_next_request_seqno(ring));
+ return i915_wait_request(ring, i915_gem_next_request_seqno(ring),
+ do_retire);
}
-int
-i915_gpu_idle(struct drm_device *dev)
+int i915_gpu_idle(struct drm_device *dev, bool do_retire)
{
drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
int ret, i;
/* Flush everything onto the inactive list. */
for (i = 0; i < I915_NUM_RINGS; i++) {
- ret = i915_ring_idle(&dev_priv->ring[i]);
+ ret = i915_ring_idle(&dev_priv->ring[i], do_retire);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
@@ -2400,7 +2402,8 @@ i915_gem_object_flush_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
if (!ring_passed_seqno(obj->last_fenced_ring,
obj->last_fenced_seqno)) {
ret = i915_wait_request(obj->last_fenced_ring,
- obj->last_fenced_seqno);
+ obj->last_fenced_seqno,
+ true);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
@@ -2541,7 +2544,8 @@ i915_gem_object_get_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
if (!ring_passed_seqno(obj->last_fenced_ring,
reg->setup_seqno)) {
ret = i915_wait_request(obj->last_fenced_ring,
- reg->setup_seqno);
+ reg->setup_seqno,
+ true);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
@@ -3710,7 +3714,7 @@ i915_gem_idle(struct drm_device *dev)
return 0;
}
- ret = i915_gpu_idle(dev);
+ ret = i915_gpu_idle(dev, true);
if (ret) {
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
return ret;
@@ -4201,7 +4205,7 @@ rescan:
* This has a dramatic impact to reduce the number of
* OOM-killer events whilst running the GPU aggressively.
*/
- if (i915_gpu_idle(dev) == 0)
+ if (i915_gpu_idle(dev, true) == 0)
goto rescan;
}
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);