diff options
| author | Daniel Vetter | 2016-12-19 09:24:23 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Vetter | 2017-01-04 10:57:23 +0100 |
| commit | 7800fb69ddf3a13d2055009c87eacf7f46f907c8 (patch) | |
| tree | 319716c75f42f3b7e18a7c5412f6a578201028ad /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | |
| parent | drm/i915: Update SKL SRV GT4 pci ids reference. (diff) | |
| download | kernel-qcow2-linux-7800fb69ddf3a13d2055009c87eacf7f46f907c8.tar.gz kernel-qcow2-linux-7800fb69ddf3a13d2055009c87eacf7f46f907c8.tar.xz kernel-qcow2-linux-7800fb69ddf3a13d2055009c87eacf7f46f907c8.zip | |
drm/i915: Update comment that sets I915_MODE_FLAG_INHERITED
The code was moved, but the comment not updated. It confused me.
Fixes: 7f4c62840cc4 ("drm/i915: Assign hwmode after encoder state readout")
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161219082423.27798-6-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 287b35a39e18..7c670d3ba465 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -16962,17 +16962,9 @@ static void intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev) * the atomic core happy. It wants a valid mode if the * crtc's enabled, so we do the above call. * - * At this point some state updated by the connectors - * in their ->detect() callback has not run yet, so - * no recalculation can be done yet. - * - * Even if we could do a recalculation and modeset - * right now it would cause a double modeset if - * fbdev or userspace chooses a different initial mode. - * - * If that happens, someone indicated they wanted a - * mode change, which means it's safe to do a full - * recalculation. + * But we don't set all the derived state fully, hence + * set a flag to indicate that a full recalculation is + * needed on the next commit. */ crtc->base.state->mode.private_flags = I915_MODE_FLAG_INHERITED; |