summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/input/touchscreen
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Mack2019-05-07 05:03:46 +0200
committerDmitry Torokhov2019-05-16 01:29:14 +0200
commitb283d0c353dee57869bdff59e0f01500f1316411 (patch)
treef7d02c0a5a2e4a9aafae611f9c382de25ba3ef8c /drivers/input/touchscreen
parentMerge tag 'ib-mfd-gpio-input-leds-power-v5.2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm... (diff)
downloadkernel-qcow2-linux-b283d0c353dee57869bdff59e0f01500f1316411.tar.gz
kernel-qcow2-linux-b283d0c353dee57869bdff59e0f01500f1316411.tar.xz
kernel-qcow2-linux-b283d0c353dee57869bdff59e0f01500f1316411.zip
Input: eeti_ts - read hardware state once after wakeup
For systems in which the touch IRQ is acting as wakeup source, and that do not support level-driven interrupts, the interrupt controller might not latch the GPIO IRQ during sleep. In such cases, the interrupt will never occur again after resume, hence the touch screen appears dead. To fix this, check for the assertion of the attn gpio, and read form the controller once in the resume path to read the hardware status and to arm the IRQ again. Introduce a mutex to guard eeti_ts_read() against parallel invocations from different contexts. Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org> Reported-by: Sven Neumann <Sven.Neumann@teufel.de> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/input/touchscreen')
-rw-r--r--drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c71
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c
index 7fe41965c5d1..b508d2693c0e 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct eeti_ts {
struct input_dev *input;
struct gpio_desc *attn_gpio;
struct touchscreen_properties props;
+ struct mutex mutex;
bool running;
};
@@ -75,42 +76,80 @@ static void eeti_ts_report_event(struct eeti_ts *eeti, u8 *buf)
input_sync(eeti->input);
}
+static int eeti_ts_read(struct eeti_ts *eeti)
+{
+ int len, error;
+ char buf[6];
+
+ len = i2c_master_recv(eeti->client, buf, sizeof(buf));
+ if (len != sizeof(buf)) {
+ error = len < 0 ? len : -EIO;
+ dev_err(&eeti->client->dev,
+ "failed to read touchscreen data: %d\n",
+ error);
+ return error;
+ }
+
+ /* Motion packet */
+ if (buf[0] & 0x80)
+ eeti_ts_report_event(eeti, buf);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static irqreturn_t eeti_ts_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct eeti_ts *eeti = dev_id;
- int len;
int error;
- char buf[6];
+
+ mutex_lock(&eeti->mutex);
do {
- len = i2c_master_recv(eeti->client, buf, sizeof(buf));
- if (len != sizeof(buf)) {
- error = len < 0 ? len : -EIO;
- dev_err(&eeti->client->dev,
- "failed to read touchscreen data: %d\n",
- error);
+ /*
+ * If we have attention GPIO, trust it. Otherwise we'll read
+ * once and exit. We assume that in this case we are using
+ * level triggered interrupt and it will get raised again
+ * if/when there is more data.
+ */
+ if (eeti->attn_gpio &&
+ !gpiod_get_value_cansleep(eeti->attn_gpio)) {
break;
}
- if (buf[0] & 0x80) {
- /* Motion packet */
- eeti_ts_report_event(eeti, buf);
- }
- } while (eeti->running &&
- eeti->attn_gpio && gpiod_get_value_cansleep(eeti->attn_gpio));
+ error = eeti_ts_read(eeti);
+ if (error)
+ break;
+
+ } while (eeti->running && eeti->attn_gpio);
+ mutex_unlock(&eeti->mutex);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
static void eeti_ts_start(struct eeti_ts *eeti)
{
+ mutex_lock(&eeti->mutex);
+
eeti->running = true;
- wmb();
enable_irq(eeti->client->irq);
+
+ /*
+ * Kick the controller in case we are using edge interrupt and
+ * we missed our edge while interrupt was disabled. We expect
+ * the attention GPIO to be wired in this case.
+ */
+ if (eeti->attn_gpio && gpiod_get_value_cansleep(eeti->attn_gpio))
+ eeti_ts_read(eeti);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&eeti->mutex);
}
static void eeti_ts_stop(struct eeti_ts *eeti)
{
+ /*
+ * Not locking here, just setting a flag and expect that the
+ * interrupt thread will notice the flag eventually.
+ */
eeti->running = false;
wmb();
disable_irq(eeti->client->irq);
@@ -153,6 +192,8 @@ static int eeti_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
return -ENOMEM;
}
+ mutex_init(&eeti->mutex);
+
input = devm_input_allocate_device(dev);
if (!input) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate input device.\n");