summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBrian Norris2012-09-27 01:15:27 +0200
committerArtem Bityutskiy2012-11-15 14:37:46 +0100
commit30fad64325ba368ffe1f92bd37f4b96c1fa4da83 (patch)
tree8ab570d3c44de56308f198b3f0928cf1d1e066fb /drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
parentmtd: ofpart: Fix incorrect NULL check in parse_ofoldpart_partitions() (diff)
downloadkernel-qcow2-linux-30fad64325ba368ffe1f92bd37f4b96c1fa4da83.tar.gz
kernel-qcow2-linux-30fad64325ba368ffe1f92bd37f4b96c1fa4da83.tar.xz
kernel-qcow2-linux-30fad64325ba368ffe1f92bd37f4b96c1fa4da83.zip
mtd: fsl_elbc_nand: remove unnecessary badblock_pattern
Since the introduction of nand_create_default_bbt_descr() (now known as nand_create_badblock_pattern()) in commit 58373ff0afff4cc8ac40608872995f4d87eb72ec nand_chip.badblock_pattern will be dynamically calculated to the same 1-byte-length pattern that is required by fsl_elbc_nand. This custom badblock_pattern is no longer needed, then, and its removal may help facilitate further nand_bbt.c/nand_base.c cleanup in the future (one down, many to go?) Anyway, with nand_bbt.c fixed, this effectively reverts: commit 452db2724351ff3d9416a183a7955e00ab4e6ab4 [MTD] [NAND] fsl_elbc_nand: fix OOB workability for large page NAND chips Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c15
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
index cc1480a5e4c1..4c4d3e5bca18 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
@@ -109,20 +109,6 @@ static struct nand_ecclayout fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm1 = {
};
/*
- * fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm* specify that LP NAND's OOB free area starts at offset
- * 1, so we have to adjust bad block pattern. This pattern should be used for
- * x8 chips only. So far hardware does not support x16 chips anyway.
- */
-static u8 scan_ff_pattern[] = { 0xff, };
-
-static struct nand_bbt_descr largepage_memorybased = {
- .options = 0,
- .offs = 0,
- .len = 1,
- .pattern = scan_ff_pattern,
-};
-
-/*
* ELBC may use HW ECC, so that OOB offsets, that NAND core uses for bbt,
* interfere with ECC positions, that's why we implement our own descriptors.
* OOB {11, 5}, works for both SP and LP chips, with ECCM = 1 and ECCM = 0.
@@ -699,7 +685,6 @@ static int fsl_elbc_chip_init_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
chip->ecc.layout = (priv->fmr & FMR_ECCM) ?
&fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm1 :
&fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm0;
- chip->badblock_pattern = &largepage_memorybased;
}
} else {
dev_err(priv->dev,