summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFrederic Weisbecker2009-02-25 06:13:16 +0100
committerIngo Molnar2009-02-25 13:40:58 +0100
commitd7350c3f45694104e820041969c8185c5f99e57c (patch)
tree7aaed9e59f6d33c82e0b62c21f9d1bda9f094b4e /fs
parenttracing/core: introduce per cpu tracing files (diff)
downloadkernel-qcow2-linux-d7350c3f45694104e820041969c8185c5f99e57c.tar.gz
kernel-qcow2-linux-d7350c3f45694104e820041969c8185c5f99e57c.tar.xz
kernel-qcow2-linux-d7350c3f45694104e820041969c8185c5f99e57c.zip
tracing/core: make the read callbacks reentrants
Now that several per-cpu files can be read or spliced at the same, we want the read/splice callbacks for tracing files to be reentrants. Until now, a single global mutex (trace_types_lock) serialized the access to tracing_read_pipe(), tracing_splice_read_pipe(), and the seq helpers. Ie: it means that if a user tries to read trace_pipe0 and trace_pipe1 at the same time, the access to the function tracing_read_pipe() is contended and one reader must wait for the other to finish its read call. The trace_type_lock mutex is mostly here to serialize the access to the global current tracer (current_trace), which can be changed concurrently. Although the iter struct keeps a private pointer to this tracer, its callbacks can be changed by another function. The method used here is to not keep anymore private reference to the tracer inside the iterator but to make a copy of it inside the iterator. Then it checks on subsequents read calls if the tracer has changed. This is not costly because the current tracer is not expected to be changed often, so we use a branch prediction for that. Moreover, we add a private mutex to the iterator (there is one iterator per file descriptor) to serialize the accesses in case of multiple consumers per file descriptor (which would be a silly idea from the user). Note that this is not to protect the ring buffer, since the ring buffer already serializes the readers accesses. This is to prevent from traces weirdness in case of concurrent consumers. But these mutexes can be dropped anyway, that would not result in any crash. Just tell me what you think about it. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions