diff options
| author | Jiong Wang | 2018-01-17 01:05:19 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Borkmann | 2018-01-18 01:26:15 +0100 |
| commit | fcfb126defda3cee3f1d9460dbe9a2ccac4fbd21 (patch) | |
| tree | a52763714b3c97f196838f3095b25f0bbb872bac /kernel/bpf/syscall.c | |
| parent | Merge tag 'linux-can-next-for-4.16-20180116' of ssh://gitolite.kernel.org/pub... (diff) | |
| download | kernel-qcow2-linux-fcfb126defda3cee3f1d9460dbe9a2ccac4fbd21.tar.gz kernel-qcow2-linux-fcfb126defda3cee3f1d9460dbe9a2ccac4fbd21.tar.xz kernel-qcow2-linux-fcfb126defda3cee3f1d9460dbe9a2ccac4fbd21.zip | |
bpf: add new jited info fields in bpf_dev_offload and bpf_prog_info
For host JIT, there are "jited_len"/"bpf_func" fields in struct bpf_prog
used by all host JIT targets to get jited image and it's length. While for
offload, targets are likely to have different offload mechanisms that these
info are kept in device private data fields.
Therefore, BPF_OBJ_GET_INFO_BY_FD syscall needs an unified way to get JIT
length and contents info for offload targets.
One way is to introduce new callback to parse device private data then fill
those fields in bpf_prog_info. This might be a little heavy, the other way
is to add generic fields which will be initialized by all offload targets.
This patch follow the second approach to introduce two new fields in
struct bpf_dev_offload and teach bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd about them to fill
correct jited_prog_len and jited_prog_insns in bpf_prog_info.
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/syscall.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 31 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index c691b9e972e3..c28524483bf4 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -1724,19 +1724,6 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog, goto done; } - ulen = info.jited_prog_len; - info.jited_prog_len = prog->jited_len; - if (info.jited_prog_len && ulen) { - if (bpf_dump_raw_ok()) { - uinsns = u64_to_user_ptr(info.jited_prog_insns); - ulen = min_t(u32, info.jited_prog_len, ulen); - if (copy_to_user(uinsns, prog->bpf_func, ulen)) - return -EFAULT; - } else { - info.jited_prog_insns = 0; - } - } - ulen = info.xlated_prog_len; info.xlated_prog_len = bpf_prog_insn_size(prog); if (info.xlated_prog_len && ulen) { @@ -1762,6 +1749,24 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog, err = bpf_prog_offload_info_fill(&info, prog); if (err) return err; + goto done; + } + + /* NOTE: the following code is supposed to be skipped for offload. + * bpf_prog_offload_info_fill() is the place to fill similar fields + * for offload. + */ + ulen = info.jited_prog_len; + info.jited_prog_len = prog->jited_len; + if (info.jited_prog_len && ulen) { + if (bpf_dump_raw_ok()) { + uinsns = u64_to_user_ptr(info.jited_prog_insns); + ulen = min_t(u32, info.jited_prog_len, ulen); + if (copy_to_user(uinsns, prog->bpf_func, ulen)) + return -EFAULT; + } else { + info.jited_prog_insns = 0; + } } done: |