clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 1f0f547c54da..eb230f06ba41 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -2847,7 +2847,7 @@ static void ftrace_shutdown_sysctl(void)
 	}
 }
 
-static cycle_t		ftrace_update_time;
+static u64		ftrace_update_time;
 unsigned long		ftrace_update_tot_cnt;
 
 static inline int ops_traces_mod(struct ftrace_ops *ops)
@@ -2894,7 +2894,7 @@ static int ftrace_update_code(struct module *mod, struct ftrace_page *new_pgs)
 {
 	struct ftrace_page *pg;
 	struct dyn_ftrace *p;
-	cycle_t start, stop;
+	u64 start, stop;
 	unsigned long update_cnt = 0;
 	unsigned long rec_flags = 0;
 	int i;