summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMimi Zohar2012-12-03 23:08:11 +0100
committerMimi Zohar2013-01-22 22:10:36 +0100
commitd79d72e02485c00b886179538dc8deaffa3be507 (patch)
tree92690d5cbd6e4a0a3bee369033fe18d9b2d065f7 /security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
parentima: increase iint flag size (diff)
downloadkernel-qcow2-linux-d79d72e02485c00b886179538dc8deaffa3be507.tar.gz
kernel-qcow2-linux-d79d72e02485c00b886179538dc8deaffa3be507.tar.xz
kernel-qcow2-linux-d79d72e02485c00b886179538dc8deaffa3be507.zip
ima: per hook cache integrity appraisal status
With the new IMA policy 'appraise_type=' option, different hooks can require different methods for appraising a file's integrity. For example, the existing 'ima_appraise_tcb' policy defines a generic rule, requiring all root files to be appraised, without specfying the appraisal method. A more specific rule could require all kernel modules, for example, to be signed. appraise fowner=0 func=MODULE_CHECK appraise_type=imasig appraise fowner=0 As a result, the integrity appraisal results for the same inode, but for different hooks, could differ. This patch caches the integrity appraisal results on a per hook basis. Changelog v2: - Rename ima_cache_status() to ima_set_cache_status() - Rename and move get_appraise_status() to ima_get_cache_status() Changelog v0: - include IMA_APPRAISE/APPRAISED_SUBMASK in IMA_DO/DONE_MASK (Dmitry) - Support independent MODULE_CHECK appraise status. - fixed IMA_XXXX_APPRAISE/APPRAISED flags Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c')
-rw-r--r--security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c22
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 1a2543a8ee53..4d7c0ae656d3 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -218,6 +218,25 @@ retry:
return true;
}
+/*
+ * In addition to knowing that we need to appraise the file in general,
+ * we need to differentiate between calling hooks.
+ */
+static int get_subaction(int func)
+{
+ switch(func) {
+ case MMAP_CHECK:
+ return IMA_MMAP_APPRAISE;
+ case BPRM_CHECK:
+ return IMA_BPRM_APPRAISE;
+ case MODULE_CHECK:
+ return IMA_MODULE_APPRAISE;
+ case FILE_CHECK:
+ default:
+ return IMA_FILE_APPRAISE;
+ }
+}
+
/**
* ima_match_policy - decision based on LSM and other conditions
* @inode: pointer to an inode for which the policy decision is being made
@@ -248,6 +267,9 @@ int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, enum ima_hooks func, int mask,
action |= entry->flags & IMA_ACTION_FLAGS;
action |= entry->action & IMA_DO_MASK;
+ if (entry->action & IMA_APPRAISE)
+ action |= get_subaction(func);
+
if (entry->action & IMA_DO_MASK)
actmask &= ~(entry->action | entry->action << 1);
else