diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 32 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index 510a7dd84c46..dd3a43792df0 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -2514,27 +2514,35 @@ out: return ret; } +/* + * Retry pseudoroot lookup with various security flavors. We do this when: + * + * NFSv4.0: the PUTROOTFH operation returns NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC + * NFSv4.1: the server does not support the SECINFO_NO_NAME operation + * + * Returns zero on success, or a negative NFS4ERR value, or a + * negative errno value. + */ static int nfs4_find_root_sec(struct nfs_server *server, struct nfs_fh *fhandle, struct nfs_fsinfo *info) { - int i, len, status = 0; - rpc_authflavor_t flav_array[NFS_MAX_SECFLAVORS]; - - len = rpcauth_list_flavors(flav_array, ARRAY_SIZE(flav_array)); - if (len < 0) - return len; - - for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { - /* AUTH_UNIX is the default flavor if none was specified, - * thus has already been tried. */ - if (flav_array[i] == RPC_AUTH_UNIX) - continue; + /* Per 3530bis 15.33.5 */ + static const rpc_authflavor_t flav_array[] = { + RPC_AUTH_GSS_KRB5P, + RPC_AUTH_GSS_KRB5I, + RPC_AUTH_GSS_KRB5, + RPC_AUTH_NULL, + }; + int status = -EPERM; + size_t i; + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(flav_array); i++) { status = nfs4_lookup_root_sec(server, fhandle, info, flav_array[i]); if (status == -NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC || status == -EACCES) continue; break; } + /* * -EACCESS could mean that the user doesn't have correct permissions * to access the mount. It could also mean that we tried to mount |