diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched/fair.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/fair.c | 183 |
1 files changed, 89 insertions, 94 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index e1febd252a84..1f877de96c9b 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ * Adaptive scheduling granularity, math enhancements by Peter Zijlstra * Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc., Peter Zijlstra */ - #include <linux/sched/mm.h> #include <linux/sched/topology.h> @@ -103,7 +102,7 @@ const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_migration_cost = 500000UL; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP /* - * For asym packing, by default the lower numbered cpu has higher priority. + * For asym packing, by default the lower numbered CPU has higher priority. */ int __weak arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu) { @@ -1181,7 +1180,7 @@ pid_t task_numa_group_id(struct task_struct *p) } /* - * The averaged statistics, shared & private, memory & cpu, + * The averaged statistics, shared & private, memory & CPU, * occupy the first half of the array. The second half of the * array is for current counters, which are averaged into the * first set by task_numa_placement. @@ -1587,7 +1586,7 @@ static void task_numa_compare(struct task_numa_env *env, * be incurred if the tasks were swapped. */ if (cur) { - /* Skip this swap candidate if cannot move to the source cpu */ + /* Skip this swap candidate if cannot move to the source CPU: */ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(env->src_cpu, &cur->cpus_allowed)) goto unlock; @@ -1631,7 +1630,7 @@ static void task_numa_compare(struct task_numa_env *env, goto balance; } - /* Balance doesn't matter much if we're running a task per cpu */ + /* Balance doesn't matter much if we're running a task per CPU: */ if (imp > env->best_imp && src_rq->nr_running == 1 && dst_rq->nr_running == 1) goto assign; @@ -1676,7 +1675,7 @@ balance: */ if (!cur) { /* - * select_idle_siblings() uses an per-cpu cpumask that + * select_idle_siblings() uses an per-CPU cpumask that * can be used from IRQ context. */ local_irq_disable(); @@ -3362,7 +3361,7 @@ static inline void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int force) } /* - * Called within set_task_rq() right before setting a task's cpu. The + * Called within set_task_rq() right before setting a task's CPU. The * caller only guarantees p->pi_lock is held; no other assumptions, * including the state of rq->lock, should be made. */ @@ -3541,7 +3540,7 @@ update_tg_cfs_runnable(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, struct cf /* * runnable_sum can't be lower than running_sum - * As running sum is scale with cpu capacity wehreas the runnable sum + * As running sum is scale with CPU capacity wehreas the runnable sum * is not we rescale running_sum 1st */ running_sum = se->avg.util_sum / @@ -4688,7 +4687,7 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) if (!se) add_nr_running(rq, task_delta); - /* determine whether we need to wake up potentially idle cpu */ + /* Determine whether we need to wake up potentially idle CPU: */ if (rq->curr == rq->idle && rq->cfs.nr_running) resched_curr(rq); } @@ -5053,7 +5052,7 @@ static void destroy_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b) } /* - * Both these cpu hotplug callbacks race against unregister_fair_sched_group() + * Both these CPU hotplug callbacks race against unregister_fair_sched_group() * * The race is harmless, since modifying bandwidth settings of unhooked group * bits doesn't do much. @@ -5098,7 +5097,7 @@ static void __maybe_unused unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(struct rq *rq) */ cfs_rq->runtime_remaining = 1; /* - * Offline rq is schedulable till cpu is completely disabled + * Offline rq is schedulable till CPU is completely disabled * in take_cpu_down(), so we prevent new cfs throttling here. */ cfs_rq->runtime_enabled = 0; @@ -5335,8 +5334,8 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, select_idle_mask); * * load' = (1 - 1/2^i) * load + (1/2^i) * cur_load * - * If a cpu misses updates for n ticks (as it was idle) and update gets - * called on the n+1-th tick when cpu may be busy, then we have: + * If a CPU misses updates for n ticks (as it was idle) and update gets + * called on the n+1-th tick when CPU may be busy, then we have: * * load_n = (1 - 1/2^i)^n * load_0 * load_n+1 = (1 - 1/2^i) * load_n + (1/2^i) * cur_load @@ -5480,7 +5479,7 @@ static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(struct rq *rq) #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON /* * There is no sane way to deal with nohz on smp when using jiffies because the - * cpu doing the jiffies update might drift wrt the cpu doing the jiffy reading + * CPU doing the jiffies update might drift wrt the CPU doing the jiffy reading * causing off-by-one errors in observed deltas; {0,2} instead of {1,1}. * * Therefore we need to avoid the delta approach from the regular tick when @@ -5591,7 +5590,7 @@ void cpu_load_update_active(struct rq *this_rq) } /* - * Return a low guess at the load of a migration-source cpu weighted + * Return a low guess at the load of a migration-source CPU weighted * according to the scheduling class and "nice" value. * * We want to under-estimate the load of migration sources, to @@ -5609,7 +5608,7 @@ static unsigned long source_load(int cpu, int type) } /* - * Return a high guess at the load of a migration-target cpu weighted + * Return a high guess at the load of a migration-target CPU weighted * according to the scheduling class and "nice" value. */ static unsigned long target_load(int cpu, int type) @@ -5889,7 +5888,7 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, max_spare_cap = 0; for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_span(group)) { - /* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */ + /* Bias balancing toward CPUs of our domain */ if (local_group) load = source_load(i, load_idx); else @@ -5919,7 +5918,7 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, if (min_runnable_load > (runnable_load + imbalance)) { /* * The runnable load is significantly smaller - * so we can pick this new cpu + * so we can pick this new CPU: */ min_runnable_load = runnable_load; min_avg_load = avg_load; @@ -5928,7 +5927,7 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, (100*min_avg_load > imbalance_scale*avg_load)) { /* * The runnable loads are close so take the - * blocked load into account through avg_load. + * blocked load into account through avg_load: */ min_avg_load = avg_load; idlest = group; @@ -5989,7 +5988,7 @@ skip_spare: } /* - * find_idlest_group_cpu - find the idlest cpu among the cpus in group. + * find_idlest_group_cpu - find the idlest CPU among the CPUs in the group. */ static int find_idlest_group_cpu(struct sched_group *group, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu) @@ -6067,12 +6066,12 @@ static inline int find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p new_cpu = find_idlest_group_cpu(group, p, cpu); if (new_cpu == cpu) { - /* Now try balancing at a lower domain level of cpu */ + /* Now try balancing at a lower domain level of 'cpu': */ sd = sd->child; continue; } - /* Now try balancing at a lower domain level of new_cpu */ + /* Now try balancing at a lower domain level of 'new_cpu': */ cpu = new_cpu; weight = sd->span_weight; sd = NULL; @@ -6082,7 +6081,6 @@ static inline int find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p if (tmp->flags & sd_flag) sd = tmp; } - /* while loop will break here if sd == NULL */ } return new_cpu; @@ -6278,12 +6276,12 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target) return target; /* - * If the previous cpu is cache affine and idle, don't be stupid. + * If the previous CPU is cache affine and idle, don't be stupid: */ if (prev != target && cpus_share_cache(prev, target) && idle_cpu(prev)) return prev; - /* Check a recently used CPU as a potential idle candidate */ + /* Check a recently used CPU as a potential idle candidate: */ recent_used_cpu = p->recent_used_cpu; if (recent_used_cpu != prev && recent_used_cpu != target && @@ -6292,7 +6290,7 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target) cpumask_test_cpu(p->recent_used_cpu, &p->cpus_allowed)) { /* * Replace recent_used_cpu with prev as it is a potential - * candidate for the next wake. + * candidate for the next wake: */ p->recent_used_cpu = prev; return recent_used_cpu; @@ -6357,7 +6355,7 @@ static inline unsigned long task_util(struct task_struct *p) } /* - * cpu_util_wake: Compute cpu utilization with any contributions from + * cpu_util_wake: Compute CPU utilization with any contributions from * the waking task p removed. */ static unsigned long cpu_util_wake(int cpu, struct task_struct *p) @@ -6403,10 +6401,10 @@ static int wake_cap(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int prev_cpu) * that have the 'sd_flag' flag set. In practice, this is SD_BALANCE_WAKE, * SD_BALANCE_FORK, or SD_BALANCE_EXEC. * - * Balances load by selecting the idlest cpu in the idlest group, or under - * certain conditions an idle sibling cpu if the domain has SD_WAKE_AFFINE set. + * Balances load by selecting the idlest CPU in the idlest group, or under + * certain conditions an idle sibling CPU if the domain has SD_WAKE_AFFINE set. * - * Returns the target cpu number. + * Returns the target CPU number. * * preempt must be disabled. */ @@ -6431,7 +6429,7 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f break; /* - * If both cpu and prev_cpu are part of this domain, + * If both 'cpu' and 'prev_cpu' are part of this domain, * cpu is a valid SD_WAKE_AFFINE target. */ if (want_affine && (tmp->flags & SD_WAKE_AFFINE) && @@ -6482,9 +6480,9 @@ pick_cpu: static void detach_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se); /* - * Called immediately before a task is migrated to a new cpu; task_cpu(p) and + * Called immediately before a task is migrated to a new CPU; task_cpu(p) and * cfs_rq_of(p) references at time of call are still valid and identify the - * previous cpu. The caller guarantees p->pi_lock or task_rq(p)->lock is held. + * previous CPU. The caller guarantees p->pi_lock or task_rq(p)->lock is held. */ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p) { @@ -6918,17 +6916,17 @@ static bool yield_to_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool preemp * BASICS * * The purpose of load-balancing is to achieve the same basic fairness the - * per-cpu scheduler provides, namely provide a proportional amount of compute + * per-CPU scheduler provides, namely provide a proportional amount of compute * time to each task. This is expressed in the following equation: * * W_i,n/P_i == W_j,n/P_j for all i,j (1) * - * Where W_i,n is the n-th weight average for cpu i. The instantaneous weight + * Where W_i,n is the n-th weight average for CPU i. The instantaneous weight * W_i,0 is defined as: * * W_i,0 = \Sum_j w_i,j (2) * - * Where w_i,j is the weight of the j-th runnable task on cpu i. This weight + * Where w_i,j is the weight of the j-th runnable task on CPU i. This weight * is derived from the nice value as per sched_prio_to_weight[]. * * The weight average is an exponential decay average of the instantaneous @@ -6936,7 +6934,7 @@ static bool yield_to_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool preemp * * W'_i,n = (2^n - 1) / 2^n * W_i,n + 1 / 2^n * W_i,0 (3) * - * C_i is the compute capacity of cpu i, typically it is the + * C_i is the compute capacity of CPU i, typically it is the * fraction of 'recent' time available for SCHED_OTHER task execution. But it * can also include other factors [XXX]. * @@ -6957,11 +6955,11 @@ static bool yield_to_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool preemp * SCHED DOMAINS * * In order to solve the imbalance equation (4), and avoid the obvious O(n^2) - * for all i,j solution, we create a tree of cpus that follows the hardware + * for all i,j solution, we create a tree of CPUs that follows the hardware * topology where each level pairs two lower groups (or better). This results - * in O(log n) layers. Furthermore we reduce the number of cpus going up the + * in O(log n) layers. Furthermore we reduce the number of CPUs going up the * tree to only the first of the previous level and we decrease the frequency - * of load-balance at each level inv. proportional to the number of cpus in + * of load-balance at each level inv. proportional to the number of CPUs in * the groups. * * This yields: @@ -6970,7 +6968,7 @@ static bool yield_to_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool preemp * \Sum { --- * --- * 2^i } = O(n) (5) * i = 0 2^i 2^i * `- size of each group - * | | `- number of cpus doing load-balance + * | | `- number of CPUs doing load-balance * | `- freq * `- sum over all levels * @@ -6978,7 +6976,7 @@ static bool yield_to_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool preemp * this makes (5) the runtime complexity of the balancer. * * An important property here is that each CPU is still (indirectly) connected - * to every other cpu in at most O(log n) steps: + * to every other CPU in at most O(log n) steps: * * The adjacency matrix of the resulting graph is given by: * @@ -6990,7 +6988,7 @@ static bool yield_to_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool preemp * * A^(log_2 n)_i,j != 0 for all i,j (7) * - * Showing there's indeed a path between every cpu in at most O(log n) steps. + * Showing there's indeed a path between every CPU in at most O(log n) steps. * The task movement gives a factor of O(m), giving a convergence complexity * of: * @@ -7000,7 +6998,7 @@ static bool yield_to_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool preemp * WORK CONSERVING * * In order to avoid CPUs going idle while there's still work to do, new idle - * balancing is more aggressive and has the newly idle cpu iterate up the domain + * balancing is more aggressive and has the newly idle CPU iterate up the domain * tree itself instead of relying on other CPUs to bring it work. * * This adds some complexity to both (5) and (8) but it reduces the total idle @@ -7021,7 +7019,7 @@ static bool yield_to_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool preemp * * s_k,i = \Sum_j w_i,j,k and S_k = \Sum_i s_k,i (10) * - * w_i,j,k is the weight of the j-th runnable task in the k-th cgroup on cpu i. + * w_i,j,k is the weight of the j-th runnable task in the k-th cgroup on CPU i. * * The big problem is S_k, its a global sum needed to compute a local (W_i) * property. @@ -7185,7 +7183,7 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) env->flags |= LBF_SOME_PINNED; /* - * Remember if this task can be migrated to any other cpu in + * Remember if this task can be migrated to any other CPU in * our sched_group. We may want to revisit it if we couldn't * meet load balance goals by pulling other tasks on src_cpu. * @@ -7195,7 +7193,7 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE || (env->flags & LBF_DST_PINNED)) return 0; - /* Prevent to re-select dst_cpu via env's cpus */ + /* Prevent to re-select dst_cpu via env's CPUs: */ for_each_cpu_and(cpu, env->dst_grpmask, env->cpus) { if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &p->cpus_allowed)) { env->flags |= LBF_DST_PINNED; @@ -7769,8 +7767,8 @@ check_cpu_capacity(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd) * Group imbalance indicates (and tries to solve) the problem where balancing * groups is inadequate due to ->cpus_allowed constraints. * - * Imagine a situation of two groups of 4 cpus each and 4 tasks each with a - * cpumask covering 1 cpu of the first group and 3 cpus of the second group. + * Imagine a situation of two groups of 4 CPUs each and 4 tasks each with a + * cpumask covering 1 CPU of the first group and 3 CPUs of the second group. * Something like: * * { 0 1 2 3 } { 4 5 6 7 } @@ -7778,7 +7776,7 @@ check_cpu_capacity(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd) * * If we were to balance group-wise we'd place two tasks in the first group and * two tasks in the second group. Clearly this is undesired as it will overload - * cpu 3 and leave one of the cpus in the second group unused. + * cpu 3 and leave one of the CPUs in the second group unused. * * The current solution to this issue is detecting the skew in the first group * by noticing the lower domain failed to reach balance and had difficulty @@ -7891,7 +7889,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_group_span(group), env->cpus) { struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i); - /* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */ + /* Bias balancing toward CPUs of our domain: */ if (local_group) load = target_load(i, load_idx); else @@ -7977,7 +7975,7 @@ asym_packing: if (!(env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_PACKING)) return true; - /* No ASYM_PACKING if target cpu is already busy */ + /* No ASYM_PACKING if target CPU is already busy */ if (env->idle == CPU_NOT_IDLE) return true; /* @@ -7990,7 +7988,7 @@ asym_packing: if (!sds->busiest) return true; - /* Prefer to move from lowest priority cpu's work */ + /* Prefer to move from lowest priority CPU's work */ if (sched_asym_prefer(sds->busiest->asym_prefer_cpu, sg->asym_prefer_cpu)) return true; @@ -8243,7 +8241,7 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s if (busiest->group_type == group_imbalanced) { /* * In the group_imb case we cannot rely on group-wide averages - * to ensure cpu-load equilibrium, look at wider averages. XXX + * to ensure CPU-load equilibrium, look at wider averages. XXX */ busiest->load_per_task = min(busiest->load_per_task, sds->avg_load); @@ -8262,7 +8260,7 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s } /* - * If there aren't any idle cpus, avoid creating some. + * If there aren't any idle CPUs, avoid creating some. */ if (busiest->group_type == group_overloaded && local->group_type == group_overloaded) { @@ -8276,9 +8274,9 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s } /* - * We're trying to get all the cpus to the average_load, so we don't + * We're trying to get all the CPUs to the average_load, so we don't * want to push ourselves above the average load, nor do we wish to - * reduce the max loaded cpu below the average load. At the same time, + * reduce the max loaded CPU below the average load. At the same time, * we also don't want to reduce the group load below the group * capacity. Thus we look for the minimum possible imbalance. */ @@ -8372,9 +8370,9 @@ static struct sched_group *find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env) if (env->idle == CPU_IDLE) { /* - * This cpu is idle. If the busiest group is not overloaded + * This CPU is idle. If the busiest group is not overloaded * and there is no imbalance between this and busiest group - * wrt idle cpus, it is balanced. The imbalance becomes + * wrt idle CPUs, it is balanced. The imbalance becomes * significant if the diff is greater than 1 otherwise we * might end up to just move the imbalance on another group */ @@ -8402,7 +8400,7 @@ out_balanced: } /* - * find_busiest_queue - find the busiest runqueue among the cpus in group. + * find_busiest_queue - find the busiest runqueue among the CPUs in the group. */ static struct rq *find_busiest_queue(struct lb_env *env, struct sched_group *group) @@ -8446,7 +8444,7 @@ static struct rq *find_busiest_queue(struct lb_env *env, /* * When comparing with imbalance, use weighted_cpuload() - * which is not scaled with the cpu capacity. + * which is not scaled with the CPU capacity. */ if (rq->nr_running == 1 && wl > env->imbalance && @@ -8454,9 +8452,9 @@ static struct rq *find_busiest_queue(struct lb_env *env, continue; /* - * For the load comparisons with the other cpu's, consider - * the weighted_cpuload() scaled with the cpu capacity, so - * that the load can be moved away from the cpu that is + * For the load comparisons with the other CPU's, consider + * the weighted_cpuload() scaled with the CPU capacity, so + * that the load can be moved away from the CPU that is * potentially running at a lower capacity. * * Thus we're looking for max(wl_i / capacity_i), crosswise @@ -8527,13 +8525,13 @@ static int should_we_balance(struct lb_env *env) return 0; /* - * In the newly idle case, we will allow all the cpu's + * In the newly idle case, we will allow all the CPUs * to do the newly idle load balance. */ if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE) return 1; - /* Try to find first idle cpu */ + /* Try to find first idle CPU */ for_each_cpu_and(cpu, group_balance_mask(sg), env->cpus) { if (!idle_cpu(cpu)) continue; @@ -8546,7 +8544,7 @@ static int should_we_balance(struct lb_env *env) balance_cpu = group_balance_cpu(sg); /* - * First idle cpu or the first cpu(busiest) in this sched group + * First idle CPU or the first CPU(busiest) in this sched group * is eligible for doing load balancing at this and above domains. */ return balance_cpu == env->dst_cpu; @@ -8655,7 +8653,7 @@ more_balance: * Revisit (affine) tasks on src_cpu that couldn't be moved to * us and move them to an alternate dst_cpu in our sched_group * where they can run. The upper limit on how many times we - * iterate on same src_cpu is dependent on number of cpus in our + * iterate on same src_cpu is dependent on number of CPUs in our * sched_group. * * This changes load balance semantics a bit on who can move @@ -8672,7 +8670,7 @@ more_balance: */ if ((env.flags & LBF_DST_PINNED) && env.imbalance > 0) { - /* Prevent to re-select dst_cpu via env's cpus */ + /* Prevent to re-select dst_cpu via env's CPUs */ cpumask_clear_cpu(env.dst_cpu, env.cpus); env.dst_rq = cpu_rq(env.new_dst_cpu); @@ -8734,9 +8732,10 @@ more_balance: raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&busiest->lock, flags); - /* don't kick the active_load_balance_cpu_stop, - * if the curr task on busiest cpu can't be - * moved to this_cpu + /* + * Don't kick the active_load_balance_cpu_stop, + * if the curr task on busiest CPU can't be + * moved to this_cpu: */ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, &busiest->curr->cpus_allowed)) { raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&busiest->lock, @@ -8962,7 +8961,7 @@ out: } /* - * active_load_balance_cpu_stop is run by cpu stopper. It pushes + * active_load_balance_cpu_stop is run by the CPU stopper. It pushes * running tasks off the busiest CPU onto idle CPUs. It requires at * least 1 task to be running on each physical CPU where possible, and * avoids physical / logical imbalances. @@ -8986,7 +8985,7 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data) if (!cpu_active(busiest_cpu) || !cpu_active(target_cpu)) goto out_unlock; - /* make sure the requested cpu hasn't gone down in the meantime */ + /* Make sure the requested CPU hasn't gone down in the meantime: */ if (unlikely(busiest_cpu != smp_processor_id() || !busiest_rq->active_balance)) goto out_unlock; @@ -8998,7 +8997,7 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data) /* * This condition is "impossible", if it occurs * we need to fix it. Originally reported by - * Bjorn Helgaas on a 128-cpu setup. + * Bjorn Helgaas on a 128-CPU setup. */ BUG_ON(busiest_rq == target_rq); @@ -9100,7 +9099,7 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(void) return; /* * Use smp_send_reschedule() instead of resched_cpu(). - * This way we generate a sched IPI on the target cpu which + * This way we generate a sched IPI on the target CPU which * is idle. And the softirq performing nohz idle load balance * will be run before returning from the IPI. */ @@ -9157,14 +9156,12 @@ unlock: } /* - * This routine will record that the cpu is going idle with tick stopped. + * This routine will record that the CPU is going idle with tick stopped. * This info will be used in performing idle load balancing in the future. */ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu) { - /* - * If this cpu is going down, then nothing needs to be done. - */ + /* If this CPU is going down, then nothing needs to be done: */ if (!cpu_active(cpu)) return; @@ -9175,9 +9172,7 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu) if (test_bit(NOHZ_TICK_STOPPED, nohz_flags(cpu))) return; - /* - * If we're a completely isolated CPU, we don't play. - */ + /* If we're a completely isolated CPU, we don't play: */ if (on_null_domain(cpu_rq(cpu))) return; @@ -9286,7 +9281,7 @@ out: /* * next_balance will be updated only when there is a need. - * When the cpu is attached to null domain for ex, it will not be + * When the CPU is attached to null domain for ex, it will not be * updated. */ if (likely(update_next_balance)) { @@ -9310,7 +9305,7 @@ out: #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON /* * In CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON case, the idle balance kickee will do the - * rebalancing for all the cpus for whom scheduler ticks are stopped. + * rebalancing for all the CPUs for whom scheduler ticks are stopped. */ static void nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle) { @@ -9330,8 +9325,8 @@ static void nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle) continue; /* - * If this cpu gets work to do, stop the load balancing - * work being done for other cpus. Next load + * If this CPU gets work to do, stop the load balancing + * work being done for other CPUs. Next load * balancing owner will pick it up. */ if (need_resched()) @@ -9373,13 +9368,13 @@ end: /* * Current heuristic for kicking the idle load balancer in the presence - * of an idle cpu in the system. + * of an idle CPU in the system. * - This rq has more than one task. * - This rq has at least one CFS task and the capacity of the CPU is * significantly reduced because of RT tasks or IRQs. - * - At parent of LLC scheduler domain level, this cpu's scheduler group has - * multiple busy cpu. - * - For SD_ASYM_PACKING, if the lower numbered cpu's in the scheduler + * - At parent of LLC scheduler domain level, this CPU's scheduler group has + * multiple busy CPUs. + * - For SD_ASYM_PACKING, if the lower numbered CPU's in the scheduler * domain span are idle. */ static inline bool nohz_kick_needed(struct rq *rq) @@ -9469,10 +9464,10 @@ static __latent_entropy void run_rebalance_domains(struct softirq_action *h) CPU_IDLE : CPU_NOT_IDLE; /* - * If this cpu has a pending nohz_balance_kick, then do the - * balancing on behalf of the other idle cpus whose ticks are + * If this CPU has a pending nohz_balance_kick, then do the + * balancing on behalf of the other idle CPUs whose ticks are * stopped. Do nohz_idle_balance *before* rebalance_domains to - * give the idle cpus a chance to load balance. Else we may + * give the idle CPUs a chance to load balance. Else we may * load balance only within the local sched_domain hierarchy * and abort nohz_idle_balance altogether if we pull some load. */ |