summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/samples/bpf/test_overhead_user.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 206Thomas Gleixner2019-05-301-4/+1Star
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of version 2 of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 107 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Steve Winslow <swinslow@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190528171438.615055994@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* samples/bpf: Check the error of write() and read()Taeung Song2018-07-051-4/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | test_task_rename() and test_urandom_read() can be failed during write() and read(), So check the result of them. Reviewed-by: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
* samples: bpf: include bpf/bpf.h instead of local libbpf.hJakub Kicinski2018-05-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | There are two files in the tree called libbpf.h which is becoming problematic. Most samples don't actually need the local libbpf.h they simply include it to get to bpf/bpf.h. Include bpf/bpf.h directly instead. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
* samples/bpf: raw tracepoint testAlexei Starovoitov2018-03-281-0/+12
| | | | | | | | add empty raw_tracepoint bpf program to test overhead similar to kprobe and traditional tracepoint tests Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
* samples/bpf: add tracepoint vs kprobe performance testsAlexei Starovoitov2016-04-081-0/+162
the first microbenchmark does fd=open("/proc/self/comm"); for() { write(fd, "test"); } and on 4 cpus in parallel: writes per sec base (no tracepoints, no kprobes) 930k with kprobe at __set_task_comm() 420k with tracepoint at task:task_rename 730k For kprobe + full bpf program manully fetches oldcomm, newcomm via bpf_probe_read. For tracepint bpf program does nothing, since arguments are copied by tracepoint. 2nd microbenchmark does: fd=open("/dev/urandom"); for() { read(fd, buf); } and on 4 cpus in parallel: reads per sec base (no tracepoints, no kprobes) 300k with kprobe at urandom_read() 279k with tracepoint at random:urandom_read 290k bpf progs attached to kprobe and tracepoint are noop. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>